What we have discovered is that whoever planned and implemented 9-11
must have had detailed knowledge of both the NORAD and FAA radar
coverage. They cunningly exploited vulnerabilities in the radar that
only the US Military and the FAA should have been aware of. The 9-11
commission only skimmed the surface of these issues, using them as a
means to draw blame away from the FAA and NORAD.
Another important question is why the hijackers took such long
illogical routes to get to their targets. Why, for example, was
Flight 93 not crashed into the World Trade Centre, which was in
sight of the airport?
Analysis of the flight paths reveals the possibility that the planes
were switched for substitute "drone" planes, operated by remote
control and loaded with explosives to cause maximum damage.
http://www.team8plus.org/the-movement/radar/Radar.htm
Comment: To avoid radar and to take advantage of the curvature of
the earth, planes fly low.
Shanksville area, Pennsylvania—Eyewitness testimonies have generally
been excluded from the official version of 9-11. Fearful of
retribution from federal agents, many eyewitnesses who spoke with
American Free Press asked that their names not be published.
While differing on some details of the plane said to be Flight 93,
which passed over Lambertsville, eyewitnesses agree that unexplained
military aircraft were in the immediate vicinity when a huge
explosive "fireball" occurred at the reclaimed coal mine near
Shanksville.
Viola Saylor saw Flight 93 pass very low over her house in
Lambertsville, which is a mile north of the official crash site. She
was in her backyard when she heard a very loud noise and looked up
to find herself "nose to nose" with Flight 93, which she says was
flying "upside down" as it passed overhead. It was blue and silver,
she said, and glistened in the sunlight. It was so low that it
rustled the leaves of her 100-foot maple tree in her yard.
A second or two" behind the "military" plane were two other planes,
which Saylor described as "normal" planes.
Shown a photograph of a Fairchild A-10 Thunderbolt II, a low-flying
combat aircraft commonly referred to as a "Warthog," Saylor
identified it as the military plane she had seen. She said she
recognized the two engines on the rear and the distinctive shape of
the cockpit and nose of the plane.
http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/flight_93.html
9/11 War Games – No Coincidence
June 08, 2004/
I have an on-the-record statement from someone in NORAD that on the
day of 9/11 The Joint Chiefs of Staff (Richard B. Myers) and NORAD
were conducting a joint, live-fly, hijack Field Training Exercise
(FTX) which involved at least one (and almost certainly many more)
aircraft under US control that was posing as a hijacked airliner".
Mike Ruppert – June 5, 2004, editor of FTW www.fromthewilderness.com
On March 25, when Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld testified before
the Commission, not one question was asked with regard to the
multiple wargames confirmed to have been in progress that morning.
Why?
It is possible that Phillip Zelikow, the executive director of the
9/11 Commission, has classified certain wargames running on 9/11 so
the Commission can't address them publicly. The fact that the war
games are open source, having been reported in mainstream
publications including the Associated Press, UPI, and Aviation
Weekly Magazine would make such a classification part & parcel to a
cover-up. Hopefully the Commission will address, in public hearing,
the impact these wargames apparently had on the NORAD response on
9/11.
For example, we know that Lt. Col. Dawne Deskins, regional Mission
Crew Chief for the VIGILANT GUARDIAN exercise, said that everyone at
the North East Air Defense Sector (NEADS), part of NORAD, initially
thought the first call she received about the real 9/11 hijackings
was part of the wargames scenario (Newhouse News, 1/25/02).
NORAD's recent admission to investigative journalist Mike Ruppert
that they were running a live-fly Field Training Exercise that
involved at least one aircraft under US control posing as a
hijacking shows VIGILANT GUARDIAN is merely the tip of the iceberg.
Especially when considering that the Joint Chiefs of Staff were
directly involved with this "drill".
There was also an NRO emergency evacuation drill running that same
morning. NRO spokesman Art Haubold told UPI, "It was just a
coincidence. It wasn't an anti-terrorism exercise. It was an
emergency response exercise. It was just a strange coincidence". The
NRO's internal war-gaming division planned the drill.
Was the NRO's war-gaming division working in conjunction with NORAD
and/or the Joint Chiefs of Staff that morning? On page 5 of former
White House counter-terrorism official Richard Clarke's new
book, "Against All Enemies", he mentions a war game titled VIGILANT
WARRIOR. Is this yet another wargame running on 9/11? In addition,
yet another drill titled NORTHERN VIGILANCE, was running on 9/11
simulating an air attack coming from Russia. Just how many war games
were running on September 11, 2001?
The NRO claims as soon as the real world events "began to unfold"
the drill was called off and all but the most essential personnel
were sent home. (UPI, Aug 22, 2002)
Read that last sentence again.
Why was the NRO sending home personnel during what was likely the
biggest military crisis on American soil in recent history? Who were
the "most essential" personnel and what did those individuals do as
events unfolded?
Did war games conducted by the Air Force, NORAD, NRO and others on
9/11 unintentionally cause this unprecedented `confusion', or does
all of this point to more disturbing conclusions about what happened
that tragic morning?
http://inn.globalfreepress.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=387
_____________________________________________________________________________
I'm injecting this into this report because it is related. Take a look at this video report and then read the report below. Thanks............Scott
The message is ready to be sent with the following file or link attachments:_______________________________________________________________
Shortcut to: HYPERLINK
"http://www.pentagonstrike.co.uk/flash.htm#Main"http://www.pentagonstrike.co
.uk/flash.htm#Main
False news release by CNN early on September 12, 2001.
September 12 CNN story at 2.06 am EDT:
"Barbara Olson, a conservative commentator and attorney,
alerted her husband, Solicitor General Ted Olson, that the plane she
was on was being hijacked Tuesday morning, Ted Olson told CNN.
Shortly afterwards Flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon" … "Ted Olson
told CNN that his wife said all passengers and flight personnel,
including the pilots, were herded to the back of the plane by armed
hijackers. The only weapons she mentioned were knives and cardboard
cutters. She felt nobody was in charge and asked her husband to tell
the pilot what to do."
About the last thing on your mind [especially if you happened to be
the US Solicitor General], would be to pick up a telephone and call
the CNN Atlanta news desk in order to give them a "scoop".
We know from the intermittent glimpses of the aircraft the air
traffic controllers had on the radar scopes, that Flight 77 was
traveling at extreme speed at very low level, pulling high "G' turns
in the process.
At very low altitude and extreme speed, the violent changes in
aircraft attitude would render the normal telephone links completely
unusable.
By the sixth month anniversary of the attack, Ted Olson was
allegedly interviewed by London Telegraph reporter Toby Harnden,
with his exclusive story "She Asked Me How To Stop The Plane"
appearing in that London newspaper on March 5, thereafter renamed
and syndicated around dozens of western countries as "Revenge Of The
Spitfire", finally appearing in the West Australian newspaper on
Saturday March 23, 2002. This story could not be found in any
American newspapers.
http://www.vialls.com/lies911/lies.htm
(FEMA) photographs taken during the attacks clearly show that the
few aircraft parts found at the Pentagon belonged to a small jet
very similar to a modified A-3 Sky Warrior--not the American
Airlines Boeing 757.
A PHYSICAL BLOCK AGAINST FINDING THIS PART FROM INTERNET SEARCHES
WITH U.S. ORIGINS!!
One aircraft part found after the Pentagon was attacked wa a front
compressor front hub assembly.
Somebody has gone through the internet and done content blocking to
where if you actually know the part number and you are actually
looking for a diagram picture, you know like an auto-cad drawing or
looking for a photograph of this particular item to prove that it
was not a 757 that hit the Pentagon.
We had to get the help of some people out of Russia and France and
Germany and Japan to go around content blocks on the U.S. search
engines and we finally found the photograph....It is what is called
a front compressor front hub assembly. In fact, there's two types.
One of them, they use it on the, what's called an A3 Sky Warrior.
The first clue was the approximately 16 foot diameter hole blasted
through three rings of the Pentagon and knowledge that no airplane
could have made that neatly blasted tunnel through three rings of
the Pentagon and the thick steel reinforced concrete walls of that
building. The only type of device that could do that is a
directional blast of one of our military weapons, sort of a
horizontal JDAM bomb.
The most damning pieces are the wing they carried out under a blue
tarp (the angles and width of which do not match any part of a 757
wing), the jet rotor hub shown in a FEMA photograph, also not a
component of any part of a 757, and the jet engine that was found
inside and one of the wheel hubs of a single wheel landing gear
instead of the 2 wheels on the front of a 757 and the 4 wheels on a
read landing gear assembly. There is a big difference in the newer
high-bypass fan jets and turbojets, with the latter being found at
the Pentagon. No 757 or 767 ever manufactured had turbojets on it,
but the A-3 Skywarrior did.
----
Two civilian defense contractor employees--told to remain silent--
say other workers quietly retro-fitted missile and remote control
systems onto A-3 jets at Colorado public airport, Fort Collins-
Loveland airport, prior to September 11 when similar A-3 parts much
smaller than a Boeing 757 were found at Pentagon
The two civilian aviation contractors at Fort Collins thought it
strange that top-secret military aviation work was being conducted
at their civilian airport, that they were being told not to tell
anyone what they saw and that there was talk of drug smuggling and
money laundering in the banking system.
Also of critical importance to a 9/11 criminal investigation is the
fact that Fort Collins-Loveland Regional Airport was being used as a
final testing site for remote control UAVs, and that is what
originally drew the attention of Karl Schwarz. Schwarz is the CEO
of a company which designs remote control/UAVs for the U.S. Army...
This revelation offers a close link to what FBI translator Sibel
Edmonds told TomFlocco.com three weeks ago regarding what she heard
during FBI intercept translations, telling us she personally
identified ten well-known Americans who are politicians and heads of
federal agencies linked to drug-money laundering in the federal
banking system which was used for political campaigns--but also
linked to financing the World Trade Center/Pentagon 9-11 attacks.
She has yet to divulge the names, however.
http://tomflocco.com/fs/WitnessesLink.htm
9-11: 200 Israeli spies were arrested.
According to FOX news, throughout late 2000 and 2001, a total of 200
Israeli spies were arrested. (13) It was the largest spy ring to
ever be uncovered in the history of the United States. The
Washington Post also reported that some of these Israelis were
arrested in connection with the 9-11 investigation. (14) US. Carl
Cameron of FOX News Channel did a excellent four part, nationally
televised, series of investigations into this blockbuster scandal.
But FOX pulled the investigative series after Zionist groups
complained to FOX executives. FOX even went so far as to remove the
written transcripts of the series from its website! In it's place
was posted a chilling, Orwellian message which reads: "This story no
longer exists." (15) Fortunately for the sake of history, the FOX
transcripts were copied onto to many other websites and all four
parts are available for your review. (see footnotes.)
The FOX series and other mainstream news media sources revealed that
many of these Israelis were army veterans with electronics and
explosives expertise.
Why were Israeli explosives experts, posing as "art students"
roaming the halls of US Federal buildings? Why were Israeli army
vets, armed with explosives and detonators, roaming the halls of the
Mexican Congress? Why were Israeli "movers" caught in vans with
explosives residue ? Might some of these shady characters have once
also "roamed the halls" of the World Trade Center prior to 9-11?
Do you remember the Mossad's "warning" about the 200 "Al-Qaeda
terrorists" said to have been preparing major attacks in the US?
(21) At the time of this writing, we are one year into the largest
investigation in American history, and not one of these
200 "terrorists" has yet to be uncovered. (22) But 200 Israeli spies
were uncovered, among them many military members, electronics
experts, wiretapping and phone tapping specialists, and explosives
experts with the skill to bring down tall buildings. (23) Logic and
common sense leads to the conclusion that the "200 Al Qaeda
terrorists" were in reality, 200 Zionist terrorists sent to frame
the Arabs for terrorist attacks and drag America into a war.
Still another US official informed FOX that some of the detained
Israelis actually had links to 9-11, but he refused to describe the
nature of those links. The FBI official told FOX's Carl Cameron:
"Evidence linking these Israelis to 9-11 is classified. I cannot
tell you about the evidence that has been gathered. It is classified
information." (16) (emphasis added)
In order for evidence "linking these Israelis to 9-11" to become
classified, the evidence has to have existed in the first place!
Furthermore, but it must have been very, very serious stuff indeed.
Only the really ugly stuff merits the distinction of
being "classified!"
Given the current state of anti-Muslim war hysteria being promoted
by the media and government, common sense dictates that if an Arab
government was ever discovered to have sponsored 9-11, we'd be
seeing the evidence night and day on the controlled media, and
hearing about it non-stop from all the President's warmongers as
well as the Israeli-occupied US Congress and Senate. This alone is
evidence that no Arab government was involved in 9-11.
http://whatreallyhappened.com/hundreds.html
Conspired to defraud the United States
The President's, Vice President's, and administration official's
deceit is not only an abuse of power; it is a federal crime. The
following evidence shows, that from early 2002 to at least March
2003, the President, the VP, and their aides conspired to defraud
the United States by intentionally misrepresenting intelligence
about the governments of Afghanistan and Iraq to persuade Congress
to authorize military force, thereby interfering with Congress's
lawful function of overseeing foreign affairs and making
appropriations, all of which violates Title 18, United States Code ,
Section 371.
Fraud (to defraud): is broadly defined to include half-truths,
omissions or misrepresentation; in other words, statements that are
intentionally misleading, even if literally true. Fraud also
includes making statements with "reckless indifference to their
truth".
Conspiracy: when two or more persons follow a course of action "to
interfere with, impede or obstruct a lawful government function by
deceit, craft, or trickery, or at least by means that are dishonest."
The U.S. Constitution, Article VI, Paragraph 2 provides, This
Constitution, and Laws of the United States, which shall be made in
Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made,
under the Authority of the United States, shall be the Supreme Law
of the Land...." The United Nations Charter, other charters, and
international instruments or treaties made under U.S. authority are
part of "the Supreme Law of the Land."
From the fall of 2001 to at least March 2003, the following
officials, and others, made hundreds of false assertions in
speeches, on television, at the United Nations, to foreign leaders,
and to Congress: President Bush, Vice President Cheney, Press
Secretary Ari Fleisher, Condoleezza Rice, Colin Powell, Donald
Rumsfeld, and Paul Wolfowitz. Their statements were remarkably
consistent and consistently false.
These falsehoods were made against an overarching deception: that
the government of Afghanistan and Iraq were involved in the 9/11
attacks.
1. The Bush administration classified the Congressional Report on
9/11 intelligence describing the Saudi Arabian government's
providing hundreds of millions of dollars to Al Quada and other
terrorist groups, yet they made numerous claims that the government
of Afghanistan supported Osama Bin Ladin.
The 2001 anthrax attacks in the United States occurred over the
course of several weeks beginning on September 18, 2001.
The UN Security Council also issued a resolution on September 18,
2001 directed towards the Taliban demanding that they hand over the
terrorist Osama bin Laden and close all terrorist training camps
immediately and unconditionally. This war has never been authorized
by the United Nations Security Council. Security Council resolution
refused to call what happened on September 11 an "armed attack"--
that is by one state against another state. Rather they called
it "terrorist attacks." so technically it is illegal under
international law. It constitutes an act and a war of aggression by
the United States against Afghanistan.
AWOL Bush did get from Congress a War Powers Resolution
authorization. This is an imperfect declaration of war. It does not
have the constitutional significance of a formal declaration of war.
It authorizes the use of military force in specified, limited
circumstances.
The United States has engaged in extended military engagements in
Afghanistan.
http://www.counterpunch.org/boyle0917.html
"US policy was to promote the rapid development of Caspian
energy....We did so...to in essence break Russia's monopoly control
over the transportation of oil [and gas] from that region, and
frankly, to promote Western energy security through diversification
of supply" (quoted in Rashid, Taliban, 174; cf. 162).
US energy company Unocal was the "lead company" among those that
would build the pipeline, which would bring Turkmen gas to market
annually. Unocal - which led a consortium of companies from Saudi
Arabia, Pakistan, Turkmenistan, Japan and South Korea - has
maintained the project is both economically and technically feasible
once Afghan stability was secured.
http://ist-socrates.berkeley.edu/~pdscott/q7.html
On October 7, 2001, the US attacks Afghanistan. (After
propositioning/deploying US troops to bases in former Soviet states
near Afghanistan.
2. Vice President Cheney claimed in Sept. 2002 irrefutable evidence
(yellow cake) existed that Iraq has reconstituted their nuclear
weapons program, a claim he repeated in March 2003.
3. On October 1, 2002 at 10 pm the Bush Administration released a
unclassified white paper summary of the October top secret CIA,
National Intelligence Estimate, the night before Senate hearings
were to begin about the declaration of war. This white paper was
completely misleading, it was the talking points for the war. It
mentioned no qualifiers to the intelligence and even added language
to distort the severity of the threat.
4. On Sept. 8, 2002, anonymous "official" told the New York Times,
Cheney, Rumsfeld, Powell, Rice, and Gen. Myers said the tubes were
suitable for making nuclear weapons.
The declassified white paper failed to mention the
dissent/disagreement about the intended use of the aluminum tubes by
the State Department's and Energy Department's intelligence analysis
that the tubes were not suited for use in centrifuges.
5. Powell claimed in Feb. 2003 with "confidence and virtual
certainty" that "Iraq today has a stockpile of between 100 and 500
tons of chemical weapons agents..."
6. July 15, 2003: AWOL Bush claimed that the war began because
Iraq would not admit UN inspectors, but what happened was AWOL Bush
opposed extending their work.
Source: The White House Criminal Conspiracy, The Nation, Nov. 14,
2005, page11- 16.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is
distributed without profit for research and educational purposes. MY
NEWSLETTER has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this
article nor is MY NEWSLETTER endorsed or sponsored by the
originator.)
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NewsViewsnolose
or the best of N&V at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/newsviewsnolose2
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/RunningOnEmptyDemocratCaucusWA/
and http://groups.yahoo.com/group/RunningOnEmptyCaucusDemocratsUSA
No comments:
Post a Comment