EMAIL
PRINT
28 COMMENTS
This post, written by Naomi Seligman, originally appeared on CREW
The Vice President of the United States, Dick Cheney, is trying to create a new legal status for himself. This latest development raises serious new questions about Cheney -- and who, if anyone, has authority over his actions. In Cheney's mind, it seems no one does.
CREW just issued this news release asking these new questions that need to be answered about Dick Cheney:
In light of new revelations that Vice President Cheney is claiming that his office is not subject to an executive order governing the handling of classified information because as president of the Senate he has both legislative and executive duties, CREW asks if Vice President Cheney is attempting to create a fourth branch of the government?
Under his argument, if Mr. Cheney is not subject to executive branch security requirements, surely he must be subject to Senate rules.
To safeguard sensitive information, in 1987 the Senate created the Office of Senate Security, which is part of the Secretary of the Senate. The Security Office's standards, procedures and requirements are set out in the Senate Security Manual, which is binding on all employees of the Senate.
So, if Mr. Cheney is a member of the Senate, he must adhere to the following:
* a requirement that any of his staff needing access to classified information undergo a security clearance and complete written non-disclosure agreements;
* physical security requirements, that the Security Office is empowered to implement, including any necessary inspections; and
* investigations of suspected security violations by employees, such as the security violation committed by Scooter Libby when he unlawfully disclosed the identity of Valerie Plame Wilson, then a covert CIA operative.
In addition, Mr. Cheney and his staff would be subject to investigation by the Senate Ethics Committee, which has the responsibility to investigate allegations of improper conduct which may reflect upon the Senate, including violations of law and the rules and regulations of the Senate.
Melanie Sloan, executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington said Mr. Cheney's arguments raise new questions:
Since there is no fourth branch of government to which Mr. Cheney could belong, by claiming the Office of the Vice President is within the legislative branch does Mr. Cheney agree that he is subject to Senate security procedures?
Mr. Cheney's office refused to describe its 2003 classification activities to the National Archives and Record Administration (NARA), but is he now willing to describe them to the Senate Security Office?
If Mr. Cheney does not believe that NARA's Information Security Oversight Office can conduct on-sight inspection of Mr. Cheney's office to see how sensitive material is handled, does he agree that the Senate Security Office can conduct such an inspection?
We'd really like some answers.
Tagged as: cheney
Naomi Seligman Steiner serves as CREW's Deputy Director and Communications Director.
PERMALINK| Also in PEEK | |||
| The Iraqi Tribunal Charade --the Media Plays Along Barry Lando: It's understandable that there's been no mention in the Baghdad courtroom of foreign complicity with Saddam’s crimes. What is surprising, though, is how thoroughly the American media have played along with that charade. Post by Barry Lando. June 24, 2007. | Giuliani ‘More Concerned With Image Than Safety’ During Anthrax Scare Nico Pitney: President Bush’s former EPA administrator Christine Todd Whitman acknowledges fault in post-9/11 management but also lays blame at Rudy Giuliani's feet. Post by Guest Blogger. June 22, 2007. | O'Reilly's Distorted Edwards Vendetta Adam Howard: Bill O'Reilly wants his viewers to think John Edwards' campaign is going down the tubes, but the facts tell a different story. Post by Adam Howard. June 22, 2007. | |
No comments:
Post a Comment