Sunday, June 24, 2007

No Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon


21 Jun 2007 (PRWEB) Pilots for 9/11 Truth obtained black box data from the government under the Freedom of Information Act for AA Flight 77, which The 9/11 Report claims hit the Pentagon. Analysis of the data contradicts the official account in direction, approach, and altitude. The plane was too high to hit lamp posts and would have flown over the Pentagon, not impacted with its ground floor. This result confirms and strengthens the previous findings of Scholars for 9/11 Truth that no Boeing 757 hit the building.

According to the report issued by Pilots for 9/11 Truth (http://pilotsfor911truth.org/), there are major differences between the official account and the flight data:

a. The NTSB Flight Path Animation approach path and altitude does not support official events.

b. All altitude data shows the aircraft at least 300 feet too high to have struck the light poles.

c. The rate of descent data is in direct conflict with the aircraft being able to impact the light poles and be captured in the Dept of Defense "5 Frames" video of an object traveling nearly parallel with the Pentagon lawn.

d. The record of data stops at least one second prior to official impact time.

e. If data trends are continued, the aircraft altitude would have been at least 100 feet too high to have hit the Pentagon

http://aftermathnews.wordpress.com/tag/operation-911/
\
Note that at the begining of the video (see link below) and ask yourself why didn't the hijacker pilot just put the nose of the plane down and head directly into the Pentagon. No..........He makes a very big high speed turn leaving himself open to being shot down by Pentagon air defense missles and then flies the plane at nearly ground level into the side of the Pentagon. Oh, yes, the hijacker couldn't fly a small civilian plane.

Why the side and not just crash it into a bigger target, like the middle of the building? Maybe they were thinking like someone controlling a remote controlled plane to get a biggest damage in an area with fewer people working or to prevent hitting something critical. Remember Roosevelt moved all the good ships out to sea at Pearl Harbor.

See the video: American 77 Final Maneuver

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DzR-q0ijbV0&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fpilotsfor911truth%2Eorg%2Fpentagon%2Ehtml

--------------

Purdue University fireproofing material and that the weakened towers

INDIANAPOLIS - June 20, 2007: A computer simulation of the 2001 World Trade Center attacks supports a federal agency's findings that the initial impact from the hijacked airplanes stripped away crucial fireproofing material and that the weakened towers collapsed under their own weight.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070620/ap_on_re_us/attacks_simulation

Purdue 9/11 simulation connected to Government

So while it claims to be independent the study was in fact funded by the government and carried out by long time government hired hands. The study clearly set out not to attempt to discover anything new but to prove the preconceived official fire theory.

A newly released Purdue University animation showing how fire caused the collapse of the World Trade Center towers on 9/11 claims to be independent but in reality has been federally funded and was conducted by individuals with direct links to the Pentagon and the White House.

Earlier this week we covered the news that the new study roughly correlates with the findings of the 2005 National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) report and supports the official line that the airplanes stripped away crucial fireproofing material and that the weakened towers collapsed under their own weight.

While the New York Times today lauds the study as "a counterpoint to the conspiracy theories

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/june2007/220607study.htm

Ryan also notes that National Geographic Today and the History Channel asserted fire temperatures of 2,900 and 2,700 F.

Since jet fuel fires burn at a maximum of around 1,500 F (unless in a special combustion chamber) and the melting point of steel is around 2,800 F, the claim that jet fuel fires melted structural steel is absurd. Although the official reports do not hold that the WTC fires melted steel, the origins of this idea is important, since it has been used as a straw-man attack by official story defenders such as Popular Mechanics.

Ryan notes that steel temperatures lag behind gas temperatures in both time and magnitude, and that none of the official reports have performed thermodynamic calculations about the probable steel temperatures. Ryan's own calculations show that steel temperatures in the impact zones probably did not exceed 600 F.

See the photo of a survivor standing in the hole the plane made after hitting the building in at this link: So much for the heat after the crash on the floors where the planes hit. And see the melted steal after the crash. Only thermate could have melted this steal.

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/wtc1_fire.html

============

9/11 Firefighters and cops say they heard Bombs and Explosions in the WTC.

See the video with smoke coming up from the base of the building in the videos. Smoke rises due to heat or dust from explosions blown by the wind near the explosion.

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/911_firefighters.html

Citizen Cause Stalking

Are these wakos harassing anti-war rprotest groups giving the impression of government spying? To creat fear in peaceful protest of the AWOL Bush administration.

Organized Stalking is a well-organized, covert harassment used against an individual or groups. It is done by large groups of people who systematically & repeatedly harass individuals or groups.

Some "extremist leaders" say that what they do is essentially what "investigative journalists" do, but they don't mention the "harassment, "break-ins", or "property damage."

Their M.O. is :

1.Identify

2 Villify

3 Nullify

4 Destroy

This book is a guide for victims on how to get rid of these people.

About the Author

David Lawson is a Florida-based Private Investigator who works cause stalking cases.

"Cause Stalking" by David Lawson

http://www.raven1.net/terstalk.htm

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit for research and educational purposes. MY NEWSLETTER has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is MY NEWSLETTER endorsed or sponsored by the originator.

My News and Views Newsletter: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NewsViewsnolose

No comments: