Monday, August 20, 2007

Faked video of 911 shown live on CNN

http://www.livevideo.com/video/socialservice/6F393F4DE41C4CF798CBB438E6378129/september-clues-part1.aspx

cut and past this link to your AOL search engine. You will see the front part of a jet coming out the other side of the south tower, yet the plane flew into it sideways with material and jet fuel coming out the side, not the opposite side.

This video was recorded by a person on his home VCR as he/she was watching "live" CNN on TV.

It takes some time to down load this video if you don't have broad-ban internet, but it is well worth watching.
Dick

------

The Large Hole in building 6 at the World Trade Center

NOTE: A note of caution. The guy who did the photo analysis on these picture, also believes photos of the US moon landing was faked. I have to admit that some evidence of fakery, I can't see in the photos, but you be the judge. I don't judge this guy too extremely, for his false assumptions about the US moon landing, we all are human. The ability to keep an open mind is what is needed in analysis. Put it in the back of your mind, if you find this to be too much or too far out.

WTC 6 was an eight-story building that stood directly northeast of the the North Tower (WTC 1). Its tenants consistent almost entirely of federal government agencies. It housed the offices of 760 employees of the U.S. Customs service

South tower (WTC2) hit by jet at 9:03 am and smoke cloud seen on CNN near WTC 6 at 9:04 am

http://www.911studies.com/911photostudies116.htm

At 10:05 am WTC2 collapsed. The official story was that WTC6 dust cloud was from the collapse.

http://www.911studies.com/911photostudies119.htm

the follow story has it the steal from WTC1 (north tower) cause the hole in WTC6, but you can see WTC1 still standing in this photo.

http://www.911studies.com/911photostudies120.htm

Hole in WTC6 has no debris pile in it

http://www.911studies.com/911photostudies123.htm

faked photo of trama victum treatment note gress is two shades of green and the green fire truck has a readish middle section
http://www.911studies.com/911photostudies5.htm

Also there should be a steel guard rail between the Pentagon and the sidewalk, but there is none in this photo.

See photos of the guard rail that is used to keep people away from the helipad

http://www.911studies.com/911photostudies17.htm
http://www.911studies.com/911photostudies15.htm

see close up of green and red -white fire truck number 61.
http://www.911studies.com/911photostudies11a.htm

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  • Within the area that the hijackings took place, there are two areas
    with no primary radar coverage that stretch up towards Canada.
  • Flight 11 switched off its transponder right next to an area with no
    primary radar coverage.
  • Flight 77 switched off its transponder right next to an area with no
    primary radar coverage.
  • Flight 93 switched off its transponder right next to an area with no
    primary radar coverage.
  • United Flight 175 switched off its transponder next to United Flight
    93.
  • We have two incidences where a hijacked plane came very close to a
    non-hijacked plane. (What are the odds?) Flight 11(hijacked) meets Flight 175
    (not hijacked). Flight 175 (hijacked) meets Flight 93 (Not Hijacked)
Question 1: How did the "hijackers" know exactly where these huge
breaches in air defence were located?

http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/911/bradm/911index/

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit for research and educational purposes. MY NEWSLETTER has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is MY NEWSLETTER endorsed or sponsored by the originator.
__._,_.___

No comments: