EMAIL
PRINT
24 COMMENTS
Share and save this post:
Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form
Also in PEEK
A Picture of the GOP on Civil Rights
Guest Blogger
Inside Fox's Latest Anti-Feminist Reality Show
Guest Blogger
Who Will Be the Next Republican Caught With Their Pants Down?
Guest Blogger
This post, written by Oliver Willis, originally appeared on Oliver Willis: Like Kryptonite to the Stupid
Colin Powell was the kind of guy I'm supposed to like. Like myself, his roots are in Jamaica, he had an accomplished military career and when the Bush team was awarded the White House, he was supposed to be the sane moderating influence on the cabal of jackals. Instead, he carried water for the war in Iraq.
He never wavered from his support of the president's policy during the entire affair. He is now attempting to rewrite the historical record, but his supposed reluctance for war is nothing but cowardice. His British equivalent, Foreign Secretary Robin Cook had the intestinal fortitude to resign in protest of the war. Colin Powell was a silent, slithering snake of a man who cheerleaded one of the worst decisions in the history of the United States.
See this RAW STORY story for more:
Powell: 'I tried to avoid this war'
It was revealed today that prior to the Iraq war, then-Secretary of State Colin Powell spent two and a half hours trying in vain to convince President George W. Bush not to invade.
"I tried to avoid this war," Powell told the Aspen Ideas Festival in Colorado, reports Sarah Baxter in the Sunday Times. Powell said he walked Bush through the risks of becoming an occupying force in an Arab country.
The sectarian violence in Iraq has escalated to the point of civil war, said Powell, and one that US forces cannot resolve.
Baxter points to plans being drawn up by Defense Secretary Robert Gates to begin a slow troop reduction to pre-"surge" levels as signs that "the views of Powell and other critics of the war are finally being heard in the Pentagon, if not yet in the White House."
Powell also asserts that any reduction in US troops must be accompanied by diplomatic measures with Syria and Iran, writes Baxter.
However, Powell may have a hard time convincing the anti-war public of his message.
"It's really too late for Mr. Powell to redeem his reputation now," comments Kevin Robbins of New York, on the Sunday Times web site. "He could have resigned and gone public at the time rather than signing on to the whole fiasco."
While "Fernandez" from San Francisco sarcastically jibes, "A whopping 2.5 hours. Wow."
Excerpts follow:
#
Speculation is growing that Gates will demonstrate his commitment to withdrawing US forces by moving a combat brigade of up to 3,000 troops out of Iraq as early as October and continuing to reduce their numbers month by month from their current strength of 160,000 to presurge levels of around 130,000 by the summer of 2008.
...
A senior defence source said it would be possible to reduce the number of American forces to roughly 50,000-70,000 by election day in November 2008. "You are going to have to have some people left behind to provide stability and security for the country and take on the terrorists," the source said.
...
The general and former joint chiefs of staff added: "Shi'ites will ultimately prevail because they are 60% of the population and their militias can be pretty violent. They will prevail also because they are determined not to be ruled again by the Sunnis.
"The Sunnis are struggling for power and survival and it's going to be resolved by a test of arms. It's going to be very ugly."
Oliver Willis writes the blog Oliver Willis: Like Kryptonite to the Stupid
No comments:
Post a Comment