Friday, October 24, 2008

The Samaritan's Dilemma: Should Government Help Your Neighbor?


By Courtney E. Martin, AlterNet. Posted October 24, 2008.


In a democracy, people depend on one another to make rules that benefit everyone. Author Deborah Stone discusses how the GOP destroyed that reality.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

In Special Coverage

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
The Debt Trap: How Banks Push Troubled Borrowers Deeper Into Debt
Brad Stone

Democracy and Elections:
Justice Department Targets ACORN But Ignores GOP Voter Suppression
Steven Rosenfeld

DrugReporter:
To Jail or Not Jail for Drug Relapse?
Tony Newman

Election 2008:
How Safe Is This Election?
Andrew Gumbel

Environment:
Why Aren't Americans Heads Over Heels for Our Environment?
Tara DePorte

ForeignPolicy:
Massive Political Upheaval in Bolivia Signals the Decline of U.S. Influence in Latin America
Benjamin Dangl

Health and Wellness:
The Biggest Breast Cancer Risk Factor That No One Is Talking About
Lucinda Marshall

Hurricane Katrina:
From the Bayou to Baghdad: Mission Not Accomplished
Amy Goodman

Immigration:
Legal Immigrants Next Target of Anti-Immigration Hardliners
Tom Barry

Media and Technology:
Cable News Phenom Maddow Doubles Her Audience in a Matter of Days
Brian Stelter

Movie Mix:
Oliver Stone's "W." -- A Catastrophe Worthy of the Worst President
Eileen Jones

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
'Ten Commandments' of Non-Sexist Language for Reporting on Violence Against Women
Sebastián Lacunza

Rights and Liberties:
My Visit With Troy Davis, a Man Facing Death on October 27th
Federica Valabrega

Sex and Relationships:
Caveman Sex: How Evolutionary Psych Pushes Sexist Stereotypes
Martha McCaughey

War on Iraq:
Despite the Threat of Harsh Punishment, Soldier Says "No" to Deployment in Afghanistan
Sarah Lazare

Water:
Manufacturing Thirst: The Hidden Water Costs of Our Industrial Economy
Kari Lydersen

More stories by Courtney E. Martin
Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!



As folks watch the economy crumble, shake their heads in unison, worry about retirement in this uncertain time and about our national security in this increasingly globalized world, and sit around in doctors' waiting rooms swapping health care horror stories, it's hard not to admit that Americans are in this together.

A new book by Deborah Stone, a Dartmouth professor and founding editor of the American Prospect, comes at just the right moment -- when we're all becoming painfully aware of how interconnected our fate is as citizens of this country. In The Samaritan's Dilemma: Should Government Help Your Neighbor? she takes the reader on a journey through America's political and ethical history over the past 80 or so years, showing us the ways in which our altruistic instincts have been slowly eroded by a strategic smear campaign on the part of conservative GOP leaders.

Stone makes a cogent, inspiring argument that we must realign our deepest knowing -- that helping our neighbors is the right thing to do -- with our public policy. AlterNet picked her brain about social policy, the state of the economy and, of course, the upcoming election.

Courtney E. Martin: In your book, you make an argument for a renewed "politics of generosity" and a return to democracy's initial essence: "mutual dependency." Can you explain what you mean?

Deborah Stone: Democracy at its simplest means government by the people. To me, that means people collaborate on making rules to guide their individual behavior for the common good. It means people work together to solve common problems, especially the problems that are too big for any one person to lick. In a democracy, we're "mutually dependent" because we depend on each other to come up with good ideas and to cooperate on putting them into practice. We're also dependent on the scientific and cultural knowledge and the social institutions built by the people before us and around us.

Once we acknowledge our mutual dependence, our politics has to start from that place, too. We have to design policies for citizens who care about each other and for each other, and who feel gratitude, loyalty and sometimes devotion. A politics of generosity means we think of ourselves as helping others and contributing to the common good. We're willing to make sacrifices and compromises in order to benefit a larger purpose.

CEM: You argue that conservative leaders -- especially Reagan -- have convinced American voters that interdependence is weak and shameful and that rugged individualism is realistic. You also show the ways in which joyful interdependence plays out around us constantly in our personal lives. Why, given our everyday experiences of altruism, did we take to the notion that it was weak writ large?

DS: Partly, I think, the conservative notion of freedom (not having to do anything you don't choose to do) taps into the painful truth of human development. Each of us grows from a helpless, dependent and powerless creature to a reasonably competent and independent adult with a high degree of autonomy. From our teen years on, we savor that freedom from adult control, even as we watch our elders sometimes become frail and revert to childlike dependence. Perhaps that's why it's easy for leaders to evoke terror and shame in us by speaking of dependence.

Partly, too, our culture celebrates individual achievement. Even team sports hype their MVP awards. From the time we're born, when our parents get our Apgar scores of infant health, we are constantly subjected to measures of our individual merits -- athletic abilities, intellectual abilities, job performance and financial accumulations. Schools emphasize individual accomplishment, and teachers punish collaboration as "cheating." When parents, schools, employers and others reward people for individual achievement, this way of thinking pushes interdependence into the background of everyone's consciousness. We begin to believe that individuals can do it all on their own if they try hard enough, and we lose sight of all the ways people get help all the time.

CEM: What are your thoughts on the developing field of social entrepreneurship -- which is largely based on the idea that creating markets, not giving charity, is the best way to change the world? Is it just the "Help is Harmful philosophy" dressed up in progressive ideas, or is it truly transformative?


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: democracy, government, altruism, deborah stone

Perfect Girls, Starving Daughters: How the Quest for Perfection Is Harming Young Women. You can read more about her work at www.courtneyemartin.com.

No comments: