||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In 1980, Lord Justice Ormrod, Lord Justice Dunn and Mr Justice Arnold
ruled in the UK's Court of Appeal that a wife from Basingstoke who
rationed sex with her husband to once a week was behaving reasonably.
Lord Hailsham later revealed that the ruling had provoked some
newspapers to try to interview the wives of all the judges in the case.
A father from Zhengzhou, in China, was refused legal permission to name
his son "@" after the keyboard character. Permission was declined on the
legal basis that all names must be capable of being translated into
Mandarin. - Gary Slapper's Case Notes, Times, UK
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/law/article2741049.ece
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In 1980, Lord Justice Ormrod, Lord Justice Dunn and Mr Justice Arnold
ruled in the UK's Court of Appeal that a wife from Basingstoke who
rationed sex with her husband to once a week was behaving reasonably.
Lord Hailsham later revealed that the ruling had provoked some
newspapers to try to interview the wives of all the judges in the case.
A father from Zhengzhou, in China, was refused legal permission to name
his son "@" after the keyboard character. Permission was declined on the
legal basis that all names must be capable of being translated into
Mandarin. - Gary Slapper's Case Notes, Times, UK
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/law/article2741049.ece
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No comments:
Post a Comment