Atheists Vocal Over Moment of Silence Law

On a personal note...........one that will definitely age me............LOL..........When I was in high school we were still required to stand a recite the "Lords Prayer" and the "Pledge of Allegiance". I was in the 10th grade and decided that I wasn't going to participate. So I stayed seated while everybody else stood and did what was "required". I was sent to see the principal because I was being"disruptive". When asked why I refused to participate, I said it was my constitutional right to refuse........then ensued a whole series of meetings with the school and my parents. The final outcome was that during that portion of the morning school "rituals" I was to get up and go stand in the hall until the recitation was concluded...........WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!! I always felt that those actions were more disruptive than if I had just been allowed to sit quietly and not participate................PEACE...............Scott


Published on Friday, December 28, 2007 by The Los Angeles Times

Atheists Vocal Over Moment of Silence Law

by P.J. Huffstutter

CHICAGO - When high school freshman Dawn Sherman learned that Illinois had a law requiring public schools to provide a moment of silence each day for “reflection and student prayer,” she was outraged.

Not because the law meant lost learning time in her honors math class - which would be 15 seconds shorter - but because “it was clear that we’re supposed to sit and pray, or sit and watch other people pray,” said Sherman, who is an atheist.

Along with her father, Rob, the Buffalo Grove High student has filed a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the law, which some Illinois school boards have raced to embrace and others have defied.

“I don’t go to school to talk to God,” she said. “I’m in school to learn.”

The debate reflects a longstanding national fight over school prayer. The Supreme Court in 1962 ruled that official sponsorship or endorsement of prayer in schools is a violation of the First Amendment. Over time, state lawmakers found that they were allowed to require moments of silence as long as students were not forced or encouraged to pray.

But there were limits: In the mid-1980s, an Alabama mandatory “moment of silence” law was found unconstitutional by the high court because “there was a clear legislative record that they were trying to advocate getting prayer back into schools,” said Charles C. Haynes, a senior scholar at the First Amendment Center in Washington.

“Since then, legislators have been far more careful about what they’re saying about why such measures are pushed forward,” Haynes said.

According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Nevada, New Hampshire, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia also require such moments of quiet in the classroom. In more than 20 other states, teachers are allowed to decide whether they want such a classroom time-out.

US District Judge Robert W. Gettleman in Illinois is set to hear oral arguments early next year over whether to grant class-action status to the Shermans’s case.

In the meantime, Gettleman has ordered Township High School District 214, which oversees Buffalo Grove High, not to participate in the moment of silence. He also has barred the superintendent of the Illinois State Board of Education from enforcing the rule or issuing any directive on how the issue should be handled in other schools.

Critics of such laws argue that they are a first step to threatening the Constitution’s separation of church and state.

“We heard a steady stream of complaints, from teachers to parents to students, in the days after the law went into effect,” said Colleen Connell, executive director of the ACLU of Illinois.

“We’ve heard about a principal telling students to remember veterans in their prayers or private reflections,” she said. “We’ve heard that teachers fold their hands and bow their heads, perhaps inadvertently, but sending a message to the kids that they should be praying.”

But advocates of the laws say they give educators a tool to focus their students’ attention and provide children a chance to reflect on either personal issues or the challenges they might face that day.

“It’s certainly a student’s constitutional right to engage in silent reflection, even if it includes prayer,” said David Cortman, senior legal counsel for the Alliance Defense Fund, a nonprofit Christian law firm that has filed briefs in the Sherman case. “It’s as if the mere mention of the word ‘prayer’ suddenly taints the law.”

In 2002, Illinois lawmakers passed the Silent Reflection and Student Prayer Act, which gave teachers the option to have a moment of silence in their classrooms as long as it was not “conducted as a religious exercise.”

The law - which supporters and critics agree is ambiguously worded - did not outline how compliance would be monitored, did not give school districts a way to opt out and did not specify whether they would be penalized for not participating.

As part of an effort to help teachers across Illinois gain control of their classrooms, state Senator Kimberly A. Lightford said, lawmakers tweaked the measure’s wording. It went from saying educators “may” observe a moment of silence to saying that they “shall.”

“What’s the problem? Every single time we meet on the Senate floor, we open up the session with prayer - whether it’s given by a rabbi, or a priest, or a Buddhist or a minister,” Lightford said.

Governor Rod R. Blagojevich vetoed the measure, citing constitutionality concerns, but lawmakers overrode him.

When the law went into effect Oct. 11, many Illinois school administrators raced to try to hash out practical issues, such as what amount of time constitutes a “moment.”

Others opted to ignore the legislation. In November, after failing to get a waiver from the state, Evanston-Skokie School District 65 board members agreed that they would not force teachers in their schools to observe the law.

© 2007 The Los Angeles Times