This is from The Progressive Review...........Editor: Sam Smith..........
FROM OUR OVERSTOCKED ARCHIVES: BEFORE THE WAR ON DRUGS
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[50 years ago this summer, your editor covered his first story in
Washington. Throughout the year, the Review will offer excerpts from
"Multitudes: The Unauthorized Memoirs of Sam Smith," the full version of
which is available on our site. The following story appeared in the
November 1970 edition of the DC Gazette, the former name of the
Progressive Review]
DC GAZETTE, 1970 - The Public Safety Committee of the DC City Council
held two days of hearings this month to hear scientific and public
testimony month to hear about marijuana. Most of what it heard was
expectable: scientifically, marijuana is a mild conscious-altering drug;
it is not addictive, nor does it lead to the use of addicting drugs; it
has been known and used and studied for literally thousands of years,
and no physiological damage whatsoever has been discovered; instances of
adverse mental effects from its use are extremely rare.
Most significant to the council's hearing -- and to a good number of
kids who are in prison on pot convictions -- was the fact, reiterated by
Surgeon General Jesse L. Steinfeld, that "in the case of marijuana,
legal penalties were originally assigned with total disregard for
medical and scientific evidence of the properties of the drug or its
effects. I know of no clearer instance in which the punishment for
infraction of the law is more harmful than the crime." . . .
Activist Petey Greene "testified" on behalf of his grandmother, whose
opinions on marijuana are based on practical experience. She once told
her grandson to quit: "Petey, you gotta stop smoking those reefers
because they make you too hungry, and I can't buy all that extra food.
Later, on comparing its effects with those of alcohol, "She said she'd
rather me smoke reefers and just sit and smile at people than drink that
old wine and come in throwing chairs around. " . . .
The testimony of representatives of the Bureau of Narcotics and
Dangerous Drugs was notable for its meekness. Although the narcs still
refer to marijuana as a killer drug before high school audiences, and
still try to imply that pot inevitably and immediately leads to heroin,
and still pass out 1930's posters of marijuana as the Grim Reaper --
they backed off under Council questioning. The narc's Dr. Milton Joffe
even allowed that although "legalizing simply for hedonistic purposes"
was not warranted, "I'm not against pleasure. . ."
Judge Charles Halleck recommended more realistic penalties, since
present laws tend to cause the community "to lose faith in the entire
system of justice." James H. Heller of the National Capital Area Civil
Liberties Union called for the legalization of pot. He said he saw no
reason that it should be treated any different from alcohol. (He
admitted to having tried grass once, "but it didn't have any effect."
("Maybe you just didn't know how to smoke it," Councilwoman Polly
Shackleton consoled him) . . .
Terry Becker, a Quicksilver Times reporter, surprised everyone by
calling for more stringent penalties and stricter enforcement. Becked
wanted "everyone to turn on everyone to get busted;" it would hasten the
revolution, he said . . .
Noting that Surgeon General Steinfeld had referred to the famous Alice
B. Toklas marijuana or hash brownies but claimed the recipe was not to
be found Alice's cookbook, the Council's Republican chairman Gilbert
Hahn opened the second day of hearings by setting the record straight.
"You will find the recipe on page 273 of Alice B. Toklas," announced
Hahn, and having fulfilled his public responsibility, he ordered the
proceedings to proceed.
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||Saturday, July 07, 2007
FROM OUR OVERSTOCKED ARCHIVES: BEFORE THE WAR ON DRUGS
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

No comments:
Post a Comment