Here are links to a really good video highlighting the evidence that
the governments story about 9-11 is BS.
If you don't have DSL, it will take a an hour or more to download
each of these three parts to this series titled Loose Change II and
you will have to cut and paste these links to a search
engine/internet explorer.
Also you can see this DVD video which will be shown at the main
branch of the Everett Library(Everett, WA) at 7 pm on May 2nd, 2006.
Loose change two part one
http://www.question911.com/linkout.php?filename=Loose%20Change%202E%
201of3.wmv
Loose change two part two
http://www.question911.com/linkout.php?filename=Loose%20Change%202E%
202of3.wmv
Loose change two part three
http://www.question911.com/linkout.php?filename=Loose%20Change%202E%
203of3.wmv
http://www.question911.com/links.php
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loose_Change_(video)#Editions
Behind the Military Revolt target is not just Rumsfeld
By Richard Holbrooke
16 April 2006 -- Retired Marine Lt. Gen. Greg Newbold's stunning
call that as officers they took an oath to the Constitution and
should now speak out on behalf of the troops in harm's way and to
save the (DoD) institution that he feels is in danger of falling
back into the disarray of the post-Vietnam era.
It is also clear that the target is not just Rumsfeld. Newbold hints
at this; others are more explicit in private. But the only two
people in the government higher than the secretary of defense are
the president and vice president. They cannot be fired, of course,
and the unspoken military code normally precludes direct public
attacks on the commander in chief when troops are under fire. (There
are exceptions to this rule, of course: In addition to MacArthur,
there was Gen. George McClellan vs. Lincoln; and on a lesser note,
Maj. Gen. John Singlaub, who was fired for attacking President Jimmy
Carter over Korea policy. But such challenges are rare enough to be
memorable, and none of these solo rebellions metastasized into a
group, a movement that can fairly be described as a revolt.
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/041606C.shtml
New Report: Rumsfeld 'Personally Involved' In Torture Allegations at
Gitmo
14 April 2006 -- Salon reports new evidence that Secretary of
Defense Donald Rumsfeld was intimately involved in prisoner abuse at
the Guantanamo Bay detention center.
According to a Dec. 20, 2005 Army inspector general's report on
Maj. Gen. Geoffrey Miller, the former commanding general in charge
of Gitmo, Rumsfeld approved an interrogation plan for Mohammed al-
Kahtani, the alleged 20th hijacker:
In a sworn statement to the inspector general, [Lt. Gen.
Randall] Schmidt described Rumsfeld as "personally involved" in the
interrogation and said that the defense secretary was "talking
weekly" with Miller.
Rumsfeld developed an interrogation plan that required the Gitmo
detainee to "stand naked in front of a female interrogator, was
accused of being a homosexual, and was forced to wear women's
underwear and to perform 'dog tricks' on a leash." Schmidt said that
the open-ended policies Rumsfeld approved, and that the apparent
lack of supervision of day-to-day interrogations permitted the wide-
scale abuse to take place.
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/041506Z.shtml
Dick
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NewsViewsnolose
or the best of N&V at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/newsviewsnolose2
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/RunningOnEmptyDemocratCaucusWA/
and http://groups.yahoo.com/group/RunningOnEmptyCaucusDemocratsU
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment