Overpopulation: Partying as the Iceberg Looms

By Jim Lydecker
The Napa Valley Register

Friday 11 November 2005

America's a lot like the Titanic making her way through an ocean of danger. Any number of icebergs threaten to do damage and several are large enough to sink us. The captain warns us of the smaller ones, yet assures us our voyage is safe.

Most passengers believe the captain. Others figure there is nothing they can do, so why worry?

Some, however, notice concerned looks on the crew's faces. Rumors are heard about one berg so big that there is no getting by regardless of the course plotted. It is connected to others making the situation more problematic. We're on a direct collision course unless the damn thing melts and gets much smaller.

The giant iceberg's given a name: Overpopulation. Some of the ones connected to it are known as resource depletion, climate change, disease, hunger and economic collapse. With no warning from the captain, the icebergs are closer than ever. The passengers party on.

Like this allegory, politicians and leaders focus our attention on issues easier addressed than those that really matter. Terrorism is an example.

Since 9/11, billions have been invested on what is a relatively small threat. Consider this: 3,000 died in New York on that fateful day in September 2001; 25,000 die every day in the world from contaminated water alone. Each year, 35 million children are mentally impaired by malnourishment. Each year, an area of prime farmland greater than Scotland is lost to erosion and urban sprawl. These are problems connected with overpopulation, problems that will get worse before they, if ever, get better.

Every statistic and number crunched, every fact absorbed, each study released makes it apparent that our industrialized civilization can't survive unless we seriously reduce our numbers. We have overshot Earth's carrying capacity by mortgaging the future.

To feed the current 6 billion people on a diet enjoyed by Americans would consume all the world's oil production. For the same 6 billion to live at our current standard of living would require world steel production to increase 200 times. This is not possible.

Two current best-sellers look into the past to explain our present and predict the future.

In his Pulitzer-winning "Guns, Germs and Steel," UCLA professor Jared Diamond examined how and why Western civilizations developed technologies and immunities to dominate much of the world. His new book, "Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed," probes the other side of the equation: What caused the great civilizations of the past to collapse into ruin and what can we learn from their fate?

In "A Short History of Progress," Canadian historian Ronald Wright examines how man throughout history has walked into "progress traps," beginning with the slaughter of big game in the Stone Age and then continued the pattern of over-consumption until most of the world's most creative civilizations fell victim to their own success.

Both books arrive at the same conclusion: Mankind has to seriously reduce its population and the speed of which we are running though Earth's finite resources. To not do so will abruptly bring down the curtain on modern civilization.

But, unlike terrorism, these are subjects politicians and leaders have a better chance of staying employed by ignoring.

The only recent politician to make energy a part of his agenda was cardigan-wearing, in-front-of-the-fireplace Jimmy Carter. Who wanted to hear the horrible truth when Ronnie was telling good-time "morning in America" fairy tales? Reagan ended up president while Jimmy faded into obscurity.

Overpopulation is an issue no one, liberal or conservative, wants to touch. The right-wing Christian conservatives say it's ungodly to screw with procreation while left-wing liberals claim it steps on our civil liberties.

So what happens? We continue to breed ourselves toward extinction.

Our leaders, and those who design and implement their policies, have chosen to ignore the real problems facing us for political and financial gain.

However, it is the responsibility of our leaders to take us down paths, regardless how uncomfortable or painful, when circumstances demand it. We face problems now, and have for several decades, that demand such actions.

Eventually our leaders will be held accountable for their actions, or lack of, and heads will roll.

Wright and Diamond point out that throughout history, once nature starts to foreclose - with famine, disease, crop failures and more - the social contract breaks down. People may suffer stoically for a while but eventually our rulers real relationship with the heavens is exposed as a fraud.

Each time history repeats itself, the cost goes up. At this point in runaway growth in population and consumption, we need to replace our irresponsible captain and crew before civilization is hopelessly bankrupt. Because even though most of the passengers party on, more and more of us know the icebergs are closer than ever.



Go to Original

'Environmental Refugees' Set to Become Big Global Scourge
Asian News International

Saturday 12 November 2005

Washington - The United Nations has said that disaster in the form of growing ranks of environmental refugees will be the big trouble the world will have to cope with, in the next few years.

It has said that by 2010 the world will need to cope with as many as 50 million people escaping the effects of creeping environmental deterioration, and it will be necessary for the international community to urgently define, recognize and extend support to this new category of 'refugees'.

Problems such as sea level rise, expanding deserts and catastrophic weather-induced flooding have already contributed to large permanent migrations and could eventually displace hundreds of millions, and it is only going to increase with the passage of time.

It said that unlike victims of political upheaval or violence, who, however have access through governments and international organizations to such assistance as financial grants, food, tools, shelter, schools and clinics, "environmental refugees" are not yet recognized in world conventions, adding that millions of people across the world get uprooted by gradual environmental change and receive comparatively little support to cope and adapt.

"There are well-founded fears that the number of people fleeing untenable environmental conditions may grow exponentially as the world experiences the effects of climate change and other phenomena. This new category of 'refugee' needs to find a place in international agreements. We need to better anticipate support requirements, similar to those of people fleeing other unviable situations," said UNU-EHS Director Janos Bogardi.

"This is a highly complex issue, with global organizations already overwhelmed by the demands of conventionally-recognized refugees, as originally defined in 1951. We should prepare now, however, to define, accept and accommodate this new breed of 'refugee' within international frameworks," said UN Under Secretary-General Hans van Ginkel, Rector of UNU.

Experts further said that though environment-related migration has been most acute in Sub-Saharan Africa, it has also affected millions of people in Asia and India. Europe and the US were also witnessing increasing pressure from victims of often mismanaged and deteriorating soil and water conditions in North Africa and Latin America.

"Around the world vulnerability is on the increase due to the rapid development of megacities in coastal areas. Many cities are overwhelmed, incapable of handling with any degree of effectiveness the demands of a burgeoning number of people, many of whom take up shelter in flimsy shanties. Combine this trend with rising sea levels and the growing number and intensity of storms and it is the recipe for a disaster-in-waiting, with enormous potential to create waves of environment-driven migration," said Dr. Oliver-Smith.