EMAIL
PRINT
437 COMMENTSShare and save this post:
Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
Can Obama Be FDR?
Robert Kuttner
Democracy and Elections:
Inside the Obama Campaign: A Grassroots View
Patrick Levine Rose
DrugReporter:
Opportunities for Drug Reform in the Obama Era
Ethan Nadelmann
Election 2008:
This Really Is Our Victory
Marisa Handler
Environment:
It Is Time to Change from Fighting Against Something to Fighting for Something
Van Jones
ForeignPolicy:
Latin America's New Consensus and the end of the Monroe Doctrine
Conn Hallinan
Health and Wellness:
Michael Pollan: Eating Is a Political Act
Mark Eisen
Hurricane Katrina:
From the Bayou to Baghdad: Mission Not Accomplished
Amy Goodman
Immigration:
Hunger Strikers Seek New Immigrant Rights Movement
Kenneth Kim
Media and Technology:
Watching Them Squirm: Is Fox News Abandoning the Mob It Created?
Mark Ames
Movie Mix:
Oliver Stone's "W." -- A Catastrophe Worthy of the Worst President
Eileen Jones
Reproductive Justice and Gender:
California's Prop 4 Jeopardizes Doctor-Patient Relationship
Carole Joffe, Dr. Eleanor Drey
Rights and Liberties:
Waiting to Die: The Cruel Phenomenon of "Death Row Syndrome"
Michael J. Carter
Sex and Relationships:
Sex Parties Helped Me Overcome My Intimacy Issues
Stephanie Auteri
War on Iraq:
Iraq Insurgents to Obama: "Withdraw Your Forces"
Water:
Wanna Save Water? Try Carpooling.
Peter N. Spotts
How was it allowed to happen? How did politics in the United States come to be dominated by people who make a virtue out of ignorance? Was it charity that has permitted mankind's closest living relative to spend two terms as president? How did Sarah Palin, Dan Quayle and other such gibbering numbskulls get to where they are? How could Republican rallies in 2008 be drowned out by screaming ignoramuses insisting that Barack Obama is a Muslim and a terrorist?
Like most people on this side of the Atlantic, I have spent my adult life mystified by American politics. The United States has the world's best universities and attracts the world's finest minds. It dominates discoveries in science and medicine. Its wealth and power depend on the application of knowledge. Yet, uniquely among the developed nations (with the possible exception of Australia), learning is a grave political disadvantage.
There have been exceptions over the past century: Franklin Roosevelt, Kennedy and Clinton tempered their intellectualism with the common touch and survived; but Adlai Stevenson, Al Gore and John Kerry were successfully tarred by their opponents as members of a cerebral elite (as if this were not a qualification for the presidency). Perhaps the defining moment in the collapse of intelligent politics was Ronald Reagan's response to Jimmy Carter during the 1980 presidential debate. Carter -- stumbling a little, using long words -- carefully enumerated the benefits of national health insurance. Reagan smiled and said, "There you go again." His own health program would have appalled most Americans, had he explained it as carefully as Carter had done, but he had found a formula for avoiding tough political issues and making his opponents look like wonks.
It wasn't always like this. The founding fathers of the republic -- men like Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, John Adams and Alexander Hamilton -- were among the greatest thinkers of their age. They felt no need to make a secret of it. How did the project they launched degenerate into George W. Bush and Sarah Palin?
On one level, this is easy to answer: Ignorant politicians are elected by ignorant people. U.S. education, like the U.S. health system, is notorious for its failures. In the most powerful nation on Earth, 1 adult in 5 believes the sun revolves around the Earth; only 26 percent accept that evolution takes place by means of natural selection; two-thirds of young adults are unable to find Iraq on a map; two-thirds of U.S. voters cannot name the three branches of government; and the math skills of 15-year-olds in the United States are ranked 24th out of the 29 countries in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
But this merely extends the mystery: How did so many U.S. citizens become so dumb and so suspicious of intelligence? Susan Jacoby's book The Age of American Unreason provides the fullest explanation I have read so far. She shows that the degradation of U.S. politics results from a series of interlocking tragedies.
One theme is both familiar and clear: Religion -- in particular fundamentalist religion -- makes you stupid. The United States is the only rich country in which Christian fundamentalism is vast and growing.
Jacoby shows that there was once a certain logic to its anti-rationalism. During the first few decades after the publication of Origin of Species, for example, Americans had good reason to reject the theory of natural selection and to treat public intellectuals with suspicion. From the beginning, Darwin's theory was mixed up in the United States with the brutal philosophy -- now known as Social Darwinism -- of the British writer Herbert Spencer. Spencer's doctrine, promoted in the popular press with the help of funding from Andrew Carnegie, John D. Rockefeller and Thomas Edison, suggested that millionaires stood at the top of a scala natura established by evolution. By preventing unfit people from being weeded out, government intervention weakened the nation, according to the doctrine; gross economic inequalities were both justifiable and necessary.
See more stories tagged with: politics, anti-intellectualism
George Monbiot is the author of Heat: How to Stop the Planet from Burning. Read more of his writings at Monbiot.com. This article originally appeared in the Guardian.
No comments:
Post a Comment