||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RAW STORY - A judge in the US District Court in Washington, D.C. has
lifted the temporary restraining order preventing the so-called 'DC
Madam,' Deborah Jeane Palfrey, from selling or distributing the list of
phone records from her escort business.
"The List in question is the Defendant's personal property," wrote judge
Gladys Kessler, "and contains only a log of telephone numbers. It was
neither seized by the Government when it searched the Defendant's
residence in California, nor listed in the Indictment putting the
Defendant on notice as to which items of her property were subject to
forfeiture.". . .
Earlier this week, in an interview with the Vallejo Times, Palfrey said
she would make the 46 pounds of Sprint phone records available to any
member of the media, including bloggers. "A couple dozen to 100 or so"
of the 10,000 names listed in the records are high profile names, said
Palfrey.
With the injunction lifted, it appears Palfrey can now "distribute the
records en masse to as many responsible journalists, press, media,
bloggers in this country," as she has promised.
http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Judge_lifts_injuction_on_DC_madam_0705.html
DEBORAH JEANE PALFREY - Deciphering the voluminous amount of data - some
of which is well over a decade old will not be an easy task. Frankly,
this likely is understating matters. It will take a small army of
people skilled in computer and phone technology, investigation as well
as factual knowledge regarding the significance OR non-significance of
identified persons. No one individual or entity will be able to connect
all of the dots. The overall endeavor easily could take many months, if
not years to research and report conscientiously.
http://deborahjeanepalfrey.com/Jeane9a.html
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RAW STORY - A judge in the US District Court in Washington, D.C. has
lifted the temporary restraining order preventing the so-called 'DC
Madam,' Deborah Jeane Palfrey, from selling or distributing the list of
phone records from her escort business.
"The List in question is the Defendant's personal property," wrote judge
Gladys Kessler, "and contains only a log of telephone numbers. It was
neither seized by the Government when it searched the Defendant's
residence in California, nor listed in the Indictment putting the
Defendant on notice as to which items of her property were subject to
forfeiture.". . .
Earlier this week, in an interview with the Vallejo Times, Palfrey said
she would make the 46 pounds of Sprint phone records available to any
member of the media, including bloggers. "A couple dozen to 100 or so"
of the 10,000 names listed in the records are high profile names, said
Palfrey.
With the injunction lifted, it appears Palfrey can now "distribute the
records en masse to as many responsible journalists, press, media,
bloggers in this country," as she has promised.
http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Judge_lifts_injuction_on_DC_madam_0705.html
DEBORAH JEANE PALFREY - Deciphering the voluminous amount of data - some
of which is well over a decade old will not be an easy task. Frankly,
this likely is understating matters. It will take a small army of
people skilled in computer and phone technology, investigation as well
as factual knowledge regarding the significance OR non-significance of
identified persons. No one individual or entity will be able to connect
all of the dots. The overall endeavor easily could take many months, if
not years to research and report conscientiously.
http://deborahjeanepalfrey.com/Jeane9a.html
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No comments:
Post a Comment