Sunday, June 03, 2007

Rural Communities Exploited by Nestlé for Your Bottled Water


By Tara Lohan, AlterNet. Posted May 30, 2007.


Bottled water costs way more than the few bucks you pay at the store. Across the U.S., rural communities are footing the bill for the booming bottled water industry. Nestlé's advance on a small town in California is the latest example.

053007story

Across the country, multinational corporations are targeting hundreds of rural communities to gain control of their most precious resource. By strong-arming small towns with limited economic means, these corporations are part of a growing trend to privatize public water supplies for economic gain in the ballooning bottled water industry.

With sales of over $35 billion worldwide in the bottled water market, corporations are doing whatever it takes to buy up pristine springs in some of our country's most beautiful places. While the companies reap the profits, the local communities and the environment are paying the price.

One of the biggest and most voracious of the water gobblers is Nestlé, which controls one-third of the U.S. market and sells 70 different brand names -- such as Arrowhead, Calistoga, Deer Park, Perrier, Poland Spring and Ice Mountain -- which it draws from 75 springs located all over the country.

Nestlé's latest target is McCloud, located in the shadow of Northern California's snow-capped Mt. Shasta. The town of McCloud has worked hard to try to reinvent itself in recent years. McCloud is a former timber town that is learning how to stand on its own feet again after the lumber companies bottomed out and took off.

The town has less than 1,400 people and a high school of four students. But one thing McCloud does have is an abundance of water -- pristine spring water that comes from Shasta's glaciers and feeds some of the world's best fly-fishing rivers.

The water hasn't just brought outdoors people to the area; it's also brought a new industry that seems strikingly similar to the timber barons who came before -- taking resources, reaping profits and moving on.

Four years ago, residents learned that Nestlé, the world's largest food and beverage company, intended to build a 1 million-square-foot water-bottling facility in McCloud. Without any public input or environmental impact assessment, the multinational was given a 100-year contract to pump 1,600 acre-feet of spring water a year and a seemingly unlimited amount of groundwater.

Although residents were caught off guard by the company's interest, they have been organizing and litigating and educating. As a result, the majority of residents in McCloud are concerned with Nestlé's project. A survey done in 2005 showed that 77 percent of people were against the contract, and public opinion has shifted even more since then as people have learned the details of the plan.

"There is concern about traffic, air pollution, what is going to happen to our water," said Debra Anderson, head of the McCloud Watershed Council, a citizen group that organized in the wake of the announcement. "What if there is a drought? They have the right to continue to pump. What happens to the town of McCloud, the people in it?"

An Unfair Contract

For Nestlé, the deal seems too good to be true. The Ashland Free Press broke down some of the details of the contract:

  • A 50-year term, renewable for another 50 years
  • The right to take 1,250 gallons per minute of spring water
  • The right to take qualified water on an interim basis from district's springs for bulk delivery to other bottling facilities located in Northern California
  • The right to construct pipelines and a loading facility
  • Use of an unknown quantity of well water for production purposes
  • Exclusive rights to one of the town's three springs
  • One hundred years of exclusivity, during which time no other beverage business of any type may exist in McCloud
  • Use of an undisclosed, perhaps unlimited amount of ground water
  • The right to require the McCloud Community Service District to dispose of process wastewater
  • The right to require the McCloud Community Service District to design, construct and install one or more ground water production wells on the bottling facility site for Nestlé's use as a supply for nonspring water purposes.

As if all that weren't enough, under the terms of the contract, Nestlé will make out handsomely. The McCloud Watershed Council has reported that Nestlé will pay .000087 cents per gallon for the water it takes from McCloud's springs. Its website explains:

In other words, that's only 8.7 cents for 100,000 gallons. Meanwhile, the rest of us who use a fraction of what Nestlé will, pay almost 20 bucks each month, just for water. On the other hand, Nestlé can sell a 16-ounce bottle of the same water for around $1.29, or $10.32 per gallon.
It's no wonder that Nestlé wanted to rush the current contract through and is fighting so hard to keep it intact. It's a sweetheart deal for Nestlé, but not for McCloud. At a shelf price of $10.32 per gallon, 1,600 acre-feet would gross $5,380,451,712. If Nestlé nets one-fifth of what that water sells for, it would make over $1 billion a year.

For the townspeople of McCloud, the contract is not so fruitful. The contract makes no provision for inflation or change in water flow or value over the course of the hundred-year agreement, and Nestlé maintains the rights to the water, but the legal responsibility for the springs remains with the town. "This would leave the people of McCloud holding the legal bag for any environmental violations resulting from Nestlé's operations and any resulting lawsuits," the Watershed Council's website says.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: mccloud, shasta, bottle water, nestle

Tara Lohan is a managing editor at AlterNet.

North American Fuel Economy Agreement

Currents - Get the Latest Environmental Buzz

Sierra Club Currents - North American Fuel Economy Agreement
Volume VI, #66
Tuesday, May 29, 2007



Quote of Note:

"The work, I think, is going to be bordering on science fiction."

-- Energy Department Assistant Secretary John Mizroch, on DOE's plan to use termites to wean the nation off its oil addiction.



(1) Gas Prices: North American Fuel Economy Agreement
(2) Katrina Recovery: Trash to Treasure
(3) Take Action: Support State's Rights to Have Clean Cars!
(4) Take Action: Protect Big Cypress National Preserve!



(1) Gas Prices: North American Fuel Economy Agreement

Filling UpWhile many in the U.S. Congress are dragging their feet on improving fuel economy, officials in Canada are ready to take action. In fact, Canadian officials announced last week that they want to improve fuel economy not only in Canada, but across the entire North American continent by setting continent-wide fuel economy benchmarks. Raising fuel economy standards to make our vehicles go further on a gallon of gas is the biggest single step we can take to lower gas prices, curb global warming and end our dependence on oil.

Find out how much you could save if Congress raised fuel economy standards.



(2) Katrina Recovery: Trash to Treasure

KatrinaIn the wake of Hurricane Katrina, many Gulf Coast communities were trashed- literally. While the government is seeking to throw the hurricane debris in a landfill, local church, community and environmental groups want more. The coalition of local groups is helping to create a future where debris and waste is looked at as a resource. By harnessing the power of recycling the citizens are creating jobs, protecting public health and saving the residents money-all while cleaning up their neighborhoods.

Learn what other people are doing to improve their communities through recycling and how you can help.

Photo courtesy Michele Sandusky.



(3) Take Action:Support State's Rights to Have Clean Cars!

FreewayThe EPA is currently deciding whether to allow California to implement the landmark Pavley clean car law. The decision will also affect the thirteen additional states across the country -- representing a total of over 40% of the U.S. auto market -- that have adopted California's clean car regulations. With over 1/3 of America's global warming emissions coming from transportation, now is the time for clean car standards that will put our country on a path to reduce U.S. global warming emissions 80% by 2050. That's 2% a year, the level scientists tell us will protect us from the worst impacts of global warming.

Support state's rights to have clean cars!



(4) Take Action: Protect Big Cypress National Preserve!

Big CypressBig Cypress National Preserve provides countless opportunities to enjoy hiking, camping, sight-seeing and otherwise experiencing the outdoors. Over 450,000 people visit the preserve each year to enjoy the park free of off-road vehicles. Now the expanded use of off-road vehicles is threatening the preserve -- detracting from the natural sounds, sights and smells that give Big Cypress its unique character. Thankfully there is a new proposal that would permanently protect this public preserve.

Tell the Department of the Interior to Protect Big Cypress National Preserve!

Sierra Club InsiderMay 29, 2007

Summer Tips for Greener Trips
Open RoadLast weekend marked the start of the summer driving season, but record-high gas prices are already turning summer "fun, fun, fun" into bummer "funds, funds, funds." Fortunately, there are ways that those of us who need to drive this summer can limit the damage to both our wallets and the environment.

Got your tire gauge ready? Check our "Summer Gas Saving Tips" and find out how you can spend less dough at the pump and more time on the beach.



Help Me, Honda
OdometerHigh gas prices impact all of us. But they don't have to. We have the technology today to make all of our cars and trucks go farther on a gallon of gas -- saving the environment and money.

To learn how much you could save if fuel-economy standards were modernized, check out the Sierra Club's newly updated mpg calculator.



Coolin' U.S.A. -- City by City
Cool CitiesTulsa, Oklahoma has become the 500th city in America to sign the U.S. Mayors Climate Protection Agreement, a commitment by mayors to reduce their cities' global warming pollution by seven percent below 1990 levels by 2012. There are now "Cool Cities" in all 50 states, representing more than 64 million people.

To help these cities meet the goals and timetable of the Mayors Agreement, more than 150 local Sierra Club Cool Cities campaigns around the country are advocating smart energy solutions such as energy efficiency, cleaner vehicles, and renewable power. Find out now whether or not you live in a Cool City.

Saturday, June 02, 2007

ECOLOGY

Can Hemp Dashboards Be Far Behind?
Union leader, Ford call for green progress in Detroit

Could Big Auto be shifting gears? Speaking at a business conference on Michigan's (car-free) Mackinac Island yesterday, Ford Motor Company Chair Bill Ford Jr. and United Automobile Workers President Ron Gettelfinger both addressed the need for Detroit to get with the green program. "Unfortunately, there is an impression among the car-buying public that the Big Three build nothing but gas guzzlers, while Toyota is a division of Greenpeace," Gettelfinger said. "If the auto industry continues to be seen as dragging its feet on environmental issues, it's going to hurt our brands and vehicles in the marketplace." Ford said his company will push to fight that perception, and got in a little told-you-so moment: "When I talked about the environment 20 years ago -- or frankly even five years -- many people thought I was eccentric at best or perhaps incredibly naive." With a key Senate debate on fuel economy standards set to begin June 11, Ford and other automakers are hoping to find a workable solution.

straight to the source: The New York Times, Nick Bunkley, 01 Jun 2007

straight to the source: The Detroit News, David Shepardson, 01 Jun 2007

straight to the source: Reuters, 31 May 2007


Check Baby Check Baby One Two ... 300
Wachovia, fourth-largest U.S. bank, plans to build 300 green branches

The fourth-largest bank in the U.S. will build only green branches by the end of 2008, aiming for 300 eco-friendly offices by 2010. Wachovia, based in Charlotte, N.C., is expanding into California and will begin its green experiment there. It is also seeking LEED certification from the U.S. Green Building Council for a financial center built in Texas last year, and a 1.2-million-square-foot office tower under construction in Charlotte. The move -- expected to save each branch $80,000 in construction costs and 20 percent in operating costs -- "makes sense on several fronts," says Patrick Mumford, the bank's head of environmental affairs. "It's an extension of our commitment to communities. Our customers and employees are also interested in how Wachovia responds to environmental change." Wachovia is also interested in keeping up with the big(ger) guys: Citibank and Bank of America, the country's two largest banks, have both recently pledged billions of dollars to environmental projects.

straight to the source: The Charlotte Observer, Associated Press, Ieva M. Augstums, 31 May 2007

straight to the source: Reuters, Jonathan Stempel, 30 May 2007

Veto threat looms over labor bills


June 1, 2007
WASHINGTON -- Labor legislation that is a priority for Democrats has become the definition of ''veto bait'' for the White House.

Five of the 24 veto threats President Bush has issued since Democrats took control of Congress target bills with provisions that benefit unions and their members.

Measures passed by either the House or Senate making it easier for unions to organize workplaces, stiffening penalties for union busting or establishing more collective bargaining rights for federal employees are among those under veto threats.

''There's really a lot of examples where he's looked at legislation, it seems, from the perspective of, 'Will this help workers?' 'Will this help workers win representation?' And if the answer is yes, he finds a reason to veto it,'' said William Samuel, the AFL-CIO's chief lobbyist.

Unions spent more than $66 million in the midterm election cycle, most of that going to Democrats.

Bush 'not going to budge'
''The American people need to know that these union leaders are consumed with a power grab,'' said Richard Berman of the Washington-based Center for Union Facts, a group critical of organized labor. ''I think most people should be glad that Bush is in the White House with the attitude that he has.''

The president has suspended rules that gave union-organized companies an advantage in winning federal contracts, rolled back overtime pay rights for some 6 million workers and enacted a free trade agreement that unions blame for exporting U.S. jobs.

''Labor has not been at all shy about their opposition to the Bush administration and his policies, and his response has been in kind,'' said Richard Hurd of Cornell University.

''He's not going to budge just because he doesn't have control; he has enough control to stop legislation.'' AP

Copyright 2007 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


Friday, June 01, 2007

May 30:


1431 : Joan of Arc martyred

At Rouen in English-controlled Normandy, Joan of Arc, the peasant girl
who became the savior of France, is burned at the stake for heresy.

Joan was born in 1412, the daughter of a tenant farmer at Domremy, on
the borders of the duchies of Bar and Lorraine. In 1415, the Hundred
Years War between England and France entered a crucial phase when the
young King Henry V of England invaded France and won a series of
decisive victories against the forces of King Charles VI. By the time
of Henry's death in August 1422, the English and their
French-Burgundian allies controlled Aquitaine and most of northern
France, including Paris. Charles VI, long incapacitated, died one
month later, and his son, Charles, regent from 1418, prepared to take
the throne. However, Reims, the traditional city of French coronation,
was held by the Anglo-Burgundians, and the Dauphin (heir apparent to
the French throne) remained uncrowned. Meanwhile, King Henry VI of
England, the infant son of Henry V and Catherine of Valois, the
daughter of Charles VI, was proclaimed king of France by the English.

Joan's village of Domremy lay on the frontier between the France of
the Dauphin and that of the Anglo-Burgundians. In the midst of this
unstable environment, Joan began hearing "voices" of three Christian
saints--St. Michael, St. Catherine, and St. Margaret. When she was
about 16, these voices exhorted her to aid the Dauphin in capturing
Reims and therefore the French throne. In May 1428, she traveled to
Vaucouleurs, a stronghold of the Dauphin, and told the captain of the
garrison of her visions. Disbelieving the young peasant girl, he sent
her home. In January 1429, she returned, and the captain, impressed by
her piety and determination, agreed to allow her passage to the
Dauphin at Chinon.

Dressed in men's clothes and accompanied by six soldiers, she reached
the Dauphin's castle at Chinon in February 1429 and was granted an
audience. Charles hid himself among his courtiers, but Joan
immediately picked him out and informed him of her divine mission. For
several weeks, Charles had Joan questioned by theologians at Poitiers,
who concluded that, given his desperate straits, the Dauphin would be
well-advised to make use of this strange and charismatic girl.

Charles furnished her with a small army, and on April 27, 1429, she
set out for Orleans, besieged by the English since October 1428. On
April 29, as a French sortie distracted the English troops on the west
side of OrlÝans, Joan entered unopposed by its eastern gate. She
brought greatly needed supplies and reinforcements and inspired the
French to a passionate resistance. She personally led the charge in
several battles and on May 7 was struck by an arrow. After quickly
dressing her wound, she returned to the fight, and the French won the
day. On May 8, the English retreated from OrlÝans.

During the next five weeks, Joan and the French commanders led the
French into a string of stunning victories over the English. On July
16, the royal army reached Reims, which opened its gates to Joan and
the Dauphin. The next day, Charles VII was crowned king of France,
with Joan standing nearby holding up her standard: an image of Christ
in judgment. After the ceremony, she knelt before Charles, joyously
calling him king for the first time.

On September 8, the king and Joan attacked Paris. During the battle,
Joan carried her standard up to the earthworks and called on the
Parisians to surrender the city to the king of France. She was wounded
but continued to rally the king's troops until Charles ordered an end
to the unsuccessful siege. That year, she led several more small
campaigns, capturing the town of Saint-Pierre-le-Moitier. In December,
Charles ennobled Joan, her parents, and her brothers.

In May 1430, the Burgundians laid siege to Compiegne, and Joan stole
into the town under the cover of darkness to aid in its defense. On
May 23, while leading a sortie against the Burgundians, she was
captured. The Burgundians sold her to the English, and in March 1431
she went on trial before ecclesiastical authorities in Rouen on
charges of heresy. Her most serious crime, according to the tribunal,
was her rejection of church authority in favor of direct inspiration
from God. After refusing to submit to the church, her sentence was
read on May 24: She was to be turned over to secular authorities and
executed. Reacting with horror to the pronouncement, Joan agreed to
recant and was condemned instead to perpetual imprisonment.

Ordered to put on women's clothes, she obeyed, but a few days later
the judges went to her cell and found her dressed again in male
attire. Questioned, she told them that St. Catherine and St. Margaret
had reproached her for giving in to the church against their will. She
was found to be a relapsed heretic and on May 29 ordered handed over
to secular officials. On May 30, Joan, 19 years old, was burned at the
stake at the Place du Vieux-Marche in Rouen. Before the pyre was lit,
she instructed a priest to hold high a crucifix for her to see and to
shout out prayers loud enough to be heard above the roar of the
flames.

As a source of military inspiration, Joan of Arc helped turn the
Hundred Years War firmly in France's favor. By 1453, Charles VII had
reconquered all of France except for Calais, which the English
relinquished in 1558. In 1920, Joan of Arc, one of the great heroes of
French history, was recognized as a Christian saint by the Roman
Catholic Church. Her feast day is May 30.

history.com/tdih.do


1806 : Andrew Jackson wins duel
history.com/tdih.do?action=tdihArticleCategory&id=5047

1868 : Civil War dead honored on Decoration Day
history.com/tdih.do?action=tdihArticleCategory&id=5048

1967 : Republic of Biafra proclaimed
history.com/tdih.do?action=tdihArticleCategory&id=5049

1971 : Mariner 9 departs for Mars
history.com/tdih.do?action=tdihArticleCategory&id=5050

###########################################

WORDS


||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

CLICHE CHALLENGE

Embedded soars into 5th place among single word cliches based on the
number of Google hits in the past three months.

Top newcomers: Benchmarks and amazing

TOP TWENTY PHRASE CLICHES

Real time - 387 million
Prior to - 286 million
In terms of - 267 million
Next generation - 150 million
Best practices - 133 million
In accordance with - 132 million
State of the art 92 million
Support services - 56 million
Cutting edge - 52 million
Sustainable development 50 million
World class - 49 million
Bottom line - 48 million
Mission statement - 40 million
All new - 34 million
Teamwork, team building, or team player 34 million
Period of time - 29 million
On the ground - 28 million
Strategic planning [plan] 28 million
Point in time - 30 million

TOP TWENTY SINGLE WORD CLICHES

Blog - 1.4 billion
Google - 954 million
Meme - 391 million
Context - 277 million
Embed, Embedded - 234 million
Concerns - 221 million
Empire, imperialism, or imperial - 213 million
Amazing 196 million
Marketplace - 193 million
Fuck, fucked, fucking - 179 million
Inappropriate - 174 million
9/11 - 169 million
Awesome - 132 million
Collaborative 127 million
Transformation 121 million
Sustainable - 114 million
Functionality - 106 million
24/7 - 103 million
Benchmark(s) 92 million
Shit - 82 million
Robust - 79 million
Empower(ing) - 62 million
Check it out - 60 million
Entrepreneur - 59 million

CLICHE CHALLENGE
http://prorev.com/cliche.htm

||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

POLITICS


||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

OBAMA OFFERS FAKE UNIVERSAL HEALTHCARE PLAN

Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama on Tuesday offered a
sweeping health care plan that would provide every citizen a means for
coverage and calls on government, businesses and consumers to share the
costs of the program. Obama said his plan could save the average
consumer $2,500 a year and bring health care to all. Campaign aides
estimated the cost of the program at $50 billion to $65 billion a year,
financed largely by eliminating tax cuts for the wealthy that are
scheduled to expire. President Bush wants to make those cuts permanent.
. .

Obama's plan retains the private insurance system but injects additional
money to pay for expanding coverage. It would also create a National
Health Insurance Exchange to monitor insurance companies in offering the
coverage. Those who can't afford coverage would get a subsidy on a
sliding scale depending on their income, and virtually all businesses
would have to share in the cost of coverage for their workers. The plan
is similar to the one covering members of Congress.

The plan doesn't have the mandate that rival Democratic candidate John
Edwards is proposing to ensure that all Americans get coverage. The 2004
Democratic vice presidential nominee would require everyone to have
health insurance, much like state requirements for auto insurance for
every driver. Both candidates would require businesses to help cover
their workers.

New York Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, who oversaw a massive but
unsuccessful project to overhaul the nation's health care system while
she was first lady, has promised universal health care but has yet to
provide specifics.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070529/ap_on_el_pr/obama_health

PROGRESSIVE REVIEW - Obama thus joins Edwards in offering a health plan
that leaves the insurance companies ripping off the country and avoids
the obvious solution of a single pay program. Meanwhile, the New Jersey
Industrial Union Council has endorsed HR 676, a single payer health care
health care bill introduced by Congressman John Conyers (D-MI). The
council represents 300,000 union members and retirees and follows the
endorsement of the bill by 274 union organizations in 43 states
including 75 Central Labor Councils and Area Labor Federations and 18
state AFL-CIOs.

As Kal Swift of the Green Party has put it, "Hillary Clinton, Barack
Obama, John Edwards, and other prominent Democrats are the greatest
obstacle to universal health coverage. Except for a few mavericks like
Rep. John Conyers [D-Mich.], who has regularly introduced single-payer
bills, Democrats have joined Republicans in favoring HMO and insurance
corporations over guaranteed publicly-financed quality health care for
every American. It's a safe bet that the 2008 Democratic nominee will --
like Bill Clinton, Al Gore, and John Kerry before them -- follow the
same pattern."

||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

PRESIDENTIAL AMBITION DROVE KERRY'S VOTE FOR WAR

GREG PIERCE, WASHINGTON TIMES - Sen. John Kerry, Massachusetts Democrat,
voted for the Iraq war resolution in 2002 after weighing the political
ramifications and being told by his future campaign manager that he
would never be elected president in 2004 unless he sided with President
Bush on the issue, according to a forthcoming book by Mr. Kerry's former
strategist. . . [Robert Shrum] writes that Mr. Kerry telephoned him on
the eve of the Oct. 11, 2002, vote. Mr. Shrum said that Mr. Kerry was
skeptical of Mr. Bush's claim that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction
and that he "didn't trust Bush to give the diplomatic route a real
chance." Nonetheless, Mr. Kerry asked Mr. Shrum whether he would "be a
viable general election candidate if he was in the small minority of
senators who voted no." Mr. Shrum wrote that he told Mr. Kerry that it
was "impossible to predict the political fallout if we went to war." But
he wrote that Jim Jordan, Mr. Kerry's former Senate press secretary and
future campaign manager, "was insisting that he had to vote with Bush."
Mr. Shrum wrote that Mr. Jordan had "hammered" Mr. Kerry with a warning:
"Go ahead and vote against it if you want, but you'll never be president
of the United States." Mr. Kerry voted for the war resolution, and Mr.
Jordan became Mr. Kerry's campaign manager three months later.

http://www.washtimes.com/functions/print.php?StoryID=20070529-120428-8000r


MORE POLITICAL NEWS
http://prorev.com/politics.htm

||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

A FEW GOOD REASONS TO DUMP HILLARY CLINTON

||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

In the 1980s, Hillary Clinton made a $44,000 profit on a $2,000
investment in a cellular phone franchise deal that involved taking
advantage of the FCC's preference for locals, minorities and women. The
franchise was almost immediately flipped to the cellular giant, McCaw.

She and her husband set up a resort land scam known as Whitewater in
which the unwitting bought third rate property 50 miles from the nearest
grocery store and, thanks to the sleazy financing, about half the
purchasers, many of them seniors, lost their property.

The Clintons' partners in Whitewater were each convicted of multiple
felonies: 18 counts of fraud and conspiracy in the case of Jim McDougal
and four counts of fraud and conspiracy in the case of Susan McDougal.

Hillary Clinton's partner and mentor at the Rose law firm, Webster
Hubbell, pleaded guilty to federal mail fraud and tax evasion charges.
Hubbell admitted he had defrauded former clients and former partners out
of more than $480,000. According to Susan Schmidt of the Washington
Post, part of this fraud was to conceal work that he and Hillary Clinton
had done for the firm: "The 15-count indictment alleges that Hubbell
covered up the Rose Law Firm's involvement in a phony
multimillion-dollar land deal that caused losses big enough to bankrupt
Madison Guaranty S&L, the thrift owned by the late James B. McDougal,
the Clintons' Whitewater business partner. Hillary Clinton's legal work
for Madison in the mid-1980s is referred to throughout the indictment
but she is accused of no wrongdoing. . . She is mentioned some 35 times
throughout the indictment, but only as Rose's '1985-86 billing partner'
for the Madison account. The document describes some of her work on
Madison's ill-fated Castle Grande project, an 1,100-acre industrial and
trailer park development south of Little Rock."

After quitting the Justice Department and before going to jail, Hubbell
met with Hillary Clinton, and followed up by getting together with major
scandal figures John Huang, James Riady, and Ng Lapseng. Riady and Huang
went to the White House every day from June 21 to June 25, 1994
according to White House records. Hubbell had breakfast and lunch with
Riady on June 23. Four days later -- and one week after Hubbell's
meeting with Hillary -- the Hong Kong Chinese Bank, jointly owed by
Lippo and the Chinese intelligence services, sends $100,000 to Hubbell.

The New York Times reported on March 17, 1992: "Hillary Clinton said
today that she did not earn 'a penny' from state business conducted by
her Little Rock law firm and that she never intervened with state
regulators on behalf of a failed Arkansas savings and loan association.
. . " Records would show that she did, in fact, represent Madison before
the state securities department. After the revelation, she says, "For
goodness sakes, you can't be a lawyer if you don't represent banks."

The Clintons claimed they were passive shareholders in Whitewater. In
1993, however, journalist Jerry Seper found that Hillary Clinton had
written to Jim McDougal enclosing a power of attorney for him to sign
"authorizing me to act on your behalf with respect to matters concerning
Whitewater Development Corporation." Another power of attorney was
enclosed for Susan McDougal. The power of attorney included the right to
endorse, sign and execute "checks, notes, deeds, agreements,
certificates, receipts or any other instruments in writing of all
matters related to Whitewater Development Corporation."

In 1993 Hillary Clinton and David Watkins moved to oust the White House
travel office in favor of World Wide Travel, Clinton's source of $1
million in fly-now-pay-later campaign trips that essentially financed
the last stages of the campaign without the bother of reporting a de
facto contribution. The White House fired seven long-term employees for
alleged mismanagement and kickbacks. The director, Billy Dale, charged
with embezzlement, was acquitted in less than two hours by the jury. An
FBI agent involved in the case, IC Smith, wrote later, "The White House
Travel Office matter sent a clear message to the Congress . . . Lying,
withholding evidence, and considering - even expecting - underlings to
be expendable so the Clintons could avoid accountability for their
actins would become the norm."

HRC'S 1994 health care plan, according to one account, included fines of
up to $5,000 for refusing to join the government-mandated health plan,
$5,000 for failing to pay premiums on time, 15 years to doctors who
received "anything of value" in exchange for helping patients
short-circuit the bureaucracy, $10,000 a day for faulty physician
paperwork, $50,000 for unauthorized patient treatment, and $100,000 a
day for drug companies that messed up federal filings. Her response to
complaints that this could easily bankrupt small businesses: "I can't be
responsible for every undercapitalized small business in America." Her
plan also would have required people to carry national identification
cards that embedded confidential patient information on computer chips.

HRC completely dismissed the idea of single payer health care Tom
Hamburger and Ted Marmor in the Washington Monthly told of a
single-payer proponent being invited to the White House in February
1993. It was, he said, a "pseudo-consultation;" the doctor was quickly
informed that "single payer is not politically feasible." When Dr. David
Himmelstein of the Harvard Medical School pressed Mrs. Clinton on single
payer, she replied, "Tell me something interesting, David.". . .
Reported Thomas Bodenehimer in Nation: "Around Hillary Rodham Clinton's
health reform table sit the managed-competition winners: big business,
hospitals, large (but not small) commercial insurers, the Blues,
budget-worried government leaders and the 'Jackson Hole Group,' the
chief intellectual honchos of the managed competition movement. . .
Adherence to the mantra of managed competition appears to be the price
of a ticket of admission to this gathering."

Two months after commencing the Whitewater scheme, Hillary Clinton
invested $1,000 in cattle futures. Within a few days she had a $5,000
profit. Before bailing out she earns nearly $100,000 on her investment.
Many years later, several economists will calculate that the chances of
earning such returns legally were one in 250 million.

In 1996, the Clintons' pal Johnny Chung agreed to plead guilty to
election law violations and cooperate with a Justice Department
investigation into illegal campaign fund-raising. Reported CNN: "During
one visit, Chung gave first lady Hillary Rodham Clinton's then-chief of
staff, Maggie Williams, a $50,000 check for the Democratic National
Committee. The check was delivered inside the White House." Chung
reportedly funneled several hundred thousand dollars from Chinese
military intelligence to Bill Clinton's 1996 campaign. As Chung put it
once, "I see the White House is like a subway -- you have to put in
coins to open the gates."

In 1996, Hillary Clinton's Rose law firm billing records, sought for two
years by congressional investigators and the special prosecutor were
found in the back room of the personal residence at the White House.
Clinton said she had no idea how they got there.

Drug dealer Jorge Cabrera gave enough to the Democrats to have his
picture taken with both Hillary Clinton and Al Gore. In a 1997 story,
Don Van Natta Jr. of the NY Times reported, "Jorge Cabrera, a drug
smuggler who has emerged as one of the most notorious supporters of
President Clinton's re-election campaign, was asked for a campaign
contribution in the unlikely locale of a hotel in Havana by a prominent
Democratic fund-raiser, congressional investigators have learned. . . On
his return to the United States several days after that meeting, in
November 1995, Cabrera wrote a check for $20,000 to the Democratic
National Committee from an account that included the proceeds from
smuggling cocaine from Colombia to the United States, said the
investigators, who spoke on condition of anonymity."

On April 27,1998, deputy independent counsel Hickman Ewing met with his
prosecutors to decide on whether to indict Hillary Clinton. Here's what
happened as reported by Sue Schmidt and Michael Weisskopf in their book,
Truth at Any Cost: "[Ewing] paced the room for more than three hours,
recalling facts from memory in his distinctive Memphis twang. He spoke
passionately, laying out a case that the first lady had obstructed
government investigators and made false statements about her legal work
for McDougal's S&L, particularly the thrift's notorious
multimillion-dollar Castle Grande real estate project. . .The biggest
problem was the death a month earlier of Jim McDougal. . . Without him,
prosecutors would have a hard time describing the S&L dealings they
suspected Hillary Clinton had lied about."

In 2000, Hillary Clinton's Senate campaign returned $22,000 in soft
money to a businesswoman linked to a Democratic campaign contribution
from a drug smuggler in Havana. The donation by Vivian Mannerud Verble,
according to the NY Post, was the largest single contribution received
by Clinton's soft-money committee.

In August 2000 Hillary Clinton held a huge Hollywood fundraiser for her
Senate campaign. It was very successful. The only problem was that, by a
long shot, she didn't report all the money contributed: $800K by the US
government's ultimate count in a settlement and $2 million according to
the key contributor and convicted con Peter Paul. This is, in election
law, the moral equivalent of not reporting a similar amount on your
income tax. It is a form of fraud. Hillary Clinton's defense is that she
didn't know about it.

Hillary Clinton's participation in a Whitewater related land deal became
suspicious enough to trigger an investigation by the Arkansas Supreme
Court. Jerry Seper reported in 2000 the probe centered "on accusations
about Mrs. Clinton's legal representation of a failed Madison Guaranty
Savings and Loan Association real estate venture, which the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corp. called a 'sham.'"

While HRC's candidacy is being hailed as a great step forward for women
that was not the case for a number of women who crossed paths with Bill
and Hillary. A number of sources have concluded that HRC ran an
extensive operation to ferret out and suppress any women who might cause
the campaign problems because of her husband's social habits. Detectives
were hired for what Dick Morris called a "a systematic campaign to
intimidate, frighten, threaten, discredit and punish innocent Americans
whose only misdeed is their desire to tell the truth in public."

Among the women who ran into problems was Kathleen Willey who had the
tires on her car mysteriously punctured with dozens of nails and her cat
suddenly disappeared. Subsequently, Willey was out jogging near her home
when a stranger approached and asked if the tires had been fixed and if
the cat had been found. The man then asked Willey, "Don't you get the
message?" and jogged off. Willey also found an animal skull on her porch
the day after she testified in the Paula Jones case.

In 2007, A Pakistani immigrant who hosted fundraisers for Sen. Hillary
Rodham Clinton became a target of the FBI allegations that he funneled
illegal contributions to Clinton's political action committee and to
Sen. Barbara Boxer's 2004 re-election campaign. Authorities say
Northridge, Calif., businessman Abdul Rehman Jinnah, 56, fled the
country shortly after being indicted on charges of engineering more than
$50,000 in illegal donations to the Democratic committees

||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

NEW ZEALAND ACTIVISTS UNCOVERED MAJOR CORPORATE SPYING ON GROUPS

||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

STUFF, NEW ZEALAND - Private investigators acting for a state-owned
enterprise have hired spies to infiltrate and undermine protest groups
in what's believed to be a New Zealand first. . . Last year a
parliamentary committee formally criticized the state power company
Mighty River Power for hiring Thompson & Clark for unspecified
activities against Greenpeace. It turns out this was the tip of an
iceberg. The private investigators are being used widely, a scale of
corporate spying against political groups never before seen in New
Zealand. Auckland Council for Civil Liberties president Barry Wilson
describes it as repellent. "These are young people trying to act in the
public good on issues like climate change. They have a basic right in a
democracy to do this without interference.

"In the same way as it is undesirable to plant corporate spies in a
board room, it is equally undesirable to plant corporate spies in
community groups," he said. "Arguably, it is even more repellent and
unethical because the corporates have so much greater resources at their
disposal to ward off people challenging them."

Thompson & Clark describes itself as New Zealand's leading corporate
intelligence agency. It is part of a worldwide trend for companies to
use the techniques of police and intelligence services against groups
that oppose their activities. Thompson & Clark's public face is a
website that offers clients "highly specialized skills" and "on-call
tactical support, complemented by teams of covert surveillance
operatives and a consultant security-guard force".

An unseen part of the website -containing key words to attract
businesses searching the internet for private investigators - lists
"covert physical and electronic surveillance", "real-time intelligence",
"political activism" and "protesters" as specialties.

The agency has specialized in working for controversial companies since
forming in 2003 as "security providers to the biotech industry". It is
secretive, keeping even its office location secret. Gavin Clark, who
oversees the students undercover, is a former police officer, armed
offender's squad member and nationally competitive kayaker. . .

Solid Energy's first known use of Thompson & Clark was publicized in the
Star-Times in April last year. Save Happy Valley supporters camping at
the site of the planned Cypress open-cast coal mine north of Westport
discovered two men monitoring their camp from a hiding place on a
neighboring ridge. . .

Later that year, the surveillance was intensified. Visitors to the West
Coast protest camp discovered a hidden digital video camera, 100 meters
of cable and electronic recording equipment being used to monitor a
public access road to the camp. . .

http://www.stuff.co.nz/4074109a6442.html

||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

WAR ON TERROR A FISCAL DISASTER, TOO

||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

JOHN MCCASLIN, WASHINGTON TIMES - The Government Accountability Office
has just sent Congress a breakdown of financial obligations to continue
fighting the global war on terrorism. . . Prior to the September 11
terrorist attacks the Defense Department's reported annual cost to fight
global terrorism was $0.2 billion. By fiscal 2006, that amount grew to
$98.4 billion. Thus far in fiscal 2007, Congress has provided the
Defense Department with another $70 billion in annual anti-terrorism
funds. . . But the Pentagon has since requested an additional $93.4
billion supplemental for this year, on top of a $141.7 billion request
for fiscal 2008. In its correspondence, the GAO tells Congress that U.S.
commitments to the GWOT will likely involve "continued investments of
significant resources, requiring decision-makers to consider difficult
trade-offs as the nation faces an increasing long-range fiscal
challenge."

http://www.washtimes.com/national/inbeltway.htm

||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

13 STATES NOW OPPOSE NATIONAL ID

||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

REUTERS - New Hampshire on Thursday joined a growing list of states to
reject a controversial U.S. identification card that opponents say will
cost billions of dollars to administer and present a risk to privacy.
The Democratic-controlled state Senate approved legislation to prohibit
the Real ID program in a 24-0 vote, and Gov. John Lynch said he would
sign the bill, which passed the state House of Representatives on April
6. New Hampshire becomes the 13th state to oppose the identification
card. Another 22 states are considering similar legislation or
resolutions to reject it, according to the American Civil Liberties
Union.

http://www.infowars.com/articles/ps/nat_id_revolt_against_us_id_card_grows.htm


||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

Don't We Have a Constitution, Not a King?


By Marjorie Cohn, AlterNet. Posted June 1, 2007.


Bush has issued a directive that would place all governmental powers in his hands in the case of a catastrophic emergency. If a terrorist attack happens before the 2008 election, could Bush and Cheney use this to avoid relinquishing power to a successor administration?

06012007storyb

As the nation focused on whether Congress would exercise its constitutional duty to cut funding for the war, Bush quietly issued an unconstitutional bombshell that went virtually unnoticed by the corporate media.

The National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive, signed on May 9, 2007, would place all governmental power in the hands of the President and effectively abolish the checks and balances in the Constitution.

If a "catastrophic emergency" -- which could include a terrorist attack or a natural disaster -- occurs, Bush's new directive says: "The President shall lead the activities of the Federal Government for ensuring constitutional government."

What about the other two co-equal branches of government? The directive throws them a bone by speaking of a "cooperative effort" among the three branches, "coordinated by the President, as a matter of comity with respect to the legislative and judicial branches and with proper respect for the constitutional separation of powers." The Vice-President would help to implement the plans.

"Comity," however, means courtesy, and the President would decide what kind of respect for the other two branches of government would be "proper." This Presidential Directive is a blatant power grab by Bush to institutionalize "the unitary executive."

A seemingly innocuous phrase, the unitary executive theory actually represents a radical, ultra rightwing interpretation of the powers of the presidency. Championed by the conservative Federalist Society, the unitary executive doctrine gathers all power in the hands of the President and insulates him from any oversight by the congressional or judicial branches.

In a November 2000 speech to the Federalist Society, then Judge Samuel Alito said the Constitution "makes the president the head of the executive branch, but it does more than that. The president has not just some executive powers, but the executive power -- the whole thing."

These "unitarians" claim that all federal agencies, even those constitutionally created by Congress, are beholden to the Chief Executive, that is, the President. This means that Bush could disband agencies like the Federal Communications Commission, the Food and Drug Administration, the Federal Reserve Board, etc., if they weren't to his liking.

Indeed, Bush signed an executive order stating that each federal agency must have a regulatory policy office run by a political appointee. Consumer advocates were concerned that this directive was aimed at weakening the Environmental Protection Agency and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. The unitary executive dogma represents audacious presidential overreaching into the constitutional province of the other two branches of government.

This doctrine took shape within the Bush administration shortly after 9/11. On September 25, 2001, former deputy assistant attorney general John Yoo used the words "unitary executive" in a memo he wrote for the White House: "The centralization of authority in the president alone is particularly crucial in matters of national defense, war, and foreign policy, where a unitary executive can evaluate threats, consider policy choices, and mobilize national resources with a speed and energy that is far superior to any other branch." Six weeks later, Bush began using that phrase in his signing statements.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: constitution, presidential directive, cheney, bush

Marjorie Cohn is a professor at Thomas Jefferson School of Law, president-elect of the National Lawyers Guild, and the US representative to the executive committee of the American Association of Jurists. Her new book, Cowboy Republic: Six Ways the Bush Gang Has Defied the Law, will be published in July.

SOS!!! SAVE OUR SITE




ONLY 30 DAYS LEFT

HOW MANY DAYS DOES MEDIACHANNEL HAVE? IT'S UP TO YOU.

30 days has September, April, June and November?
So does MediaChannel - unless you act now.

New York, June 1, 2007: We now have one month to avoid writing and posting our own obituary:

"June 30, 2007: MediaChannel.org died today after seven and a half years as a leading not for profit online media issues site and global media monitoring network. The main reason cited was a lack of sustaining funding?."

"It is sad to have to shut down an important service in the public interest because our not-for-profit site can't attract sufficient resources to support a very small staff or to pay necessary bills including rent, server fees and utilities," said Danny Schechter, co-founder of the international web platform that launched February 1, 2000. "The ultimate irony is that MediaChannel has never been better -- its traffic is up and its impact strong, as is the quality of its timely and diverse offerings, which include original reports, blogs, videos, features and media news from across the world."

Despite a successful fundraising drive that kept MediaChannel online for several months, almost exclusively through reader and member support, we are now forced to face the inevitable: the site can only stay online for another thirty days unless we are able to attract a partner, an angel, a major funder or financial help from MediaChannel's global community of affiliates and individual users.

Can we find the support we need in the next thirty days? That's our challenge--but if you want to keep the site alive, it's your challenge too.

If we can get 1500 of our readers (that means you) to give $25, we can keep going for another quarter.

[PLEASE CLICK HERE TO MAKE A TAX-DEDUCTIBLE DONATION ONLINE]

MediaChannel is particularly open to an affiliation with an educational institution that could use the site as an educational tool or teaching platform in online journalism and media criticism.

WHY THIS IS HAPPENING

"Nothing lasts forever?particularly in the fast-changing media world," says co-founder Rory O'Connor, author of the popular "Media Is A Plural" blog, which often features breaking news, exposes, and original interviews with many leaders of the media industry. "Revenue models have been radically altered since MediaChannel was created, and the foundation world has largely turned away from support of independent media in recent years, with funders who made the site possible now supporting other priorities."

As a result, other independent, media-oriented not-for-profits have already had to close their doors. Now MediaChannel may have to follow suit.

MediaChannel has always had a multi-level funding approach. Grants to its tax-exempt fiscal sponsor The Global Center were supplemented by donations from readers, in-kind services and volunteer work by staff and trainees, sales of books and videos, and perpetual funding drives. Our for- profit company Globalvision has subsidized the site with donated footage, services, and cash infusions totaling hundreds of thousands of dollars. Our top executives have worked hard to keep the site up, often donating their time to work without salaries. We can no longer afford to subsidize the site.

A UNIQUE, INTERNATIONAL, NON-PARTISAN EFFORT

Unlike MediaChannel, many similar sites have pursued more parochial or partisan agendas and rarely focused on global trends and issues. In contrast, MediaChannel cares about the challenges of reporting in and on the developing world - and as a result is frequently invited to speak and moderate at global media conferences from Kazakhstan to Korea, and from South Africa to South America.

MediaChannel has also featured bloggers from all over the world (such as Iraq's award-winning "Riverbend,") along with in-depth coverage of how our mainstream media - and not just the Bush Administration -- led the country into the disastrous Iraq War. Danny Schechter's "News Dissector" blog has tracked the details of the deception behind the push for war on a daily basis. MediaChannel has also inspired many books and films, including "Embedded: Weapons of Mass Deception" and "When News Lies: Media Complicity and the Iraq War," and the documentary "WMD: Weapons of Mass Deception," which won awards worldwide and was broadcast in 39 countries. All of these initiatives have helped promote the uniqueness of Mediachannel.org.

WHAT IS TO BE DONE?

MediaChannel started with a staff of ten. We now have only one half-time paid staff member - who has done his best to keep the site up and timely. We have acquired videos and created many of our own, which have been carried regularly on "The Listening Post," Al-Jazeera English's media program, as well as widely distributed on such social networks as YouTube and Google Video. Such global visibility, coupled with the fact that our own original reporting and analysis is picked up widely by other websites, should be of interest to some funder. (If you are out there, please raise your hand!)

We have only thirty days left. Hopefully June will burst out all over us. But if not, we will have to bid you adieu with special thanks to the many readers who joined MediaChannel, donated so generously and sent emails to media outlets by the hundreds of thousands to urge better coverage, greater democracy, and better journalistic standards over the years.

We want to thank those funders who did stay with us, and appeal once again to the generosity and understanding of those of you in a position to help in the hopes that if we can keep going, we will find new sources of support.

THIRTY DAYS TO GO

This is the appeal we didn't want to write but have little choice. We have THIRTY DAYS to turn this around. Can you help? Will you help? As you know, the concept of 30 Days is well known -- as in the 30-day trial. It is often employed by the shareware industry, where you can download a trial version of a piece of software and try it out risk-free for 30 days before you're required to buy the full version. Says Steve Pavlina, "It's also a great way to develop new habits, and best of all, it's brain-dead simple."

It's simple. In 30 days, MediaChannel will be brain dead?unless you join with us to keep this important work of watching the media alive.

Make a tax-deductible donation today.

You can send a check made out to our fiscal sponsor:
THE GLOBAL CENTER
575 Eighth Avenue, Suite 2200
New York, New York 10018

or

[CLICK HERE TO DONATE ONLINE]

If you have ideas or suggestions, please write to Dissector@mediachannel.org

REMEMBER: THE SITE YOU SAVE MAY BE YOUR OWN.