Sunday, September 30, 2007

Have Camera, will Report


by James Stone (Posted by Populist Party) Page 1 of 1 page(s)

http://www.opednews.com


Tell A Friend

Seems that these days, everyone's got a way to record potential news going on around them - whether it's digital cameras, video recorders, or cell phones - there's plenty of options, and people are using them to report current events.

Take the recent "taser" incident at the John Kerry event in Florida. According to Howard Kurtz at the Washington Post:

"CNN aired the footage last Tuesday hours after receiving it (Clarissa Jessup also posted it on YouTube), sparking a national debate over whether the police went too far or the journalism student got what he deserved. Without those pictures, the story would have been a mere blip"

Call it a fad, call it a phenomenon, call it whatever you'd like, but citizen journalism is a reality - and it's playing an integral part in newsrooms nationwide.

On top of it, networks have a veritable army of reporters - all for free.

In his article Kurtz tells of some astounding numbers of "citizen journalist" submissions to the major networks:

  • -- Fox has received nearly 40,000 videos and pictures in six months under its uReport initiative.


  • -- MSNBC's FirstPerson program has drawn 28,000 submissions since its launch in late April.
  • -- At CNN, the first cable network to launch such an effort 14 months ago, more than 60,000 videos and pictures have poured in from its "I-Reporters."

This is no small feat, and shows the power of everyday people reporting the news. It's so strong that each of these networks have spent time and money creating a system for their viewers to submit the news - and it makes delivery that much faster. Think about it, a person on the scene has video of an event - an accident, a disaster, etc - there's no way the network could've gotten footage...until now.

This is revolutionizing the news industry in some ways. Kurtz continues:

Some stories might not exist without cellphone cameras, such as the footage of Michael Richards's racist rant at a comedy club. And such footage can be valuable. TMZ.com, the gossip site that pays for information, obtained the Richards video.

The rise of citizen newsgathering is changing the news business in subtle ways. It's an extension of the Facebook culture, in which members post hundreds of pictures of themselves, and the YouTube ethos, where pointing and shooting can capture "macaca"-type embarrassments. And it sends a signal that anyone, not just well-dressed professionals with good hair and a resonant voice, can be a journalist.

Not only is this changing the mainstream newsrooms - but it's also opening up a wider market - one where virtually anyone with a good idea and some technical skills can develop a virtual newsroom online.

It's the goal, for example, of the Knight News Challenge, which is giving away development cash of about $5 million for “innovative new media projects that serve the needs of local communities.”

One thing's for sure, the face of the newsroom, and the news that's being reported, is changing. And, it's not the result of a new editorial style, but rather, it's due to technical innovation, citizen involvement, and consumer demand for better reporting.

Contact Editor

America in Crisis, Parts I and II


by SUSAN ROSENTHAL (Posted by Jason Miller) Page 1 of 4 page(s)

http://www.opednews.com


Tell A Friend

Thomas Paine's Corner

http://www.bestcyrano.org/THOMASPAINE/?p=320

Part I: Class Conflict

BY SUSAN ROSENTHAL

Dateline: September 17, 2007 CROSSPOSTED AT AUTHOR’S BLOGSITE: SUSAN’S BLOG

AMERICA IS DEEPLY DIVIDED. For one thing, most Americans want an end to the war against Iraq and some form of universal health care, while the ruling class is committed to the war and to sacrificing social services to pay for it.

This conflict between the rulers and the ruled reflects a deeper, structural rift. In a series of three articles (Z Magazine, February, April, May, 2007), Jack Rasmus documents how,

“From the early 1980s on, income inequality widened, deepened, and accelerated until today well over $1 trillion in income is being transferred every year from the roughly 90 million working class families in the U.S. to corporations and the wealthiest non-working class households.”

Thirty-five years of pro-business social policies have hurtled class inequality back to the level of the 1920s. One percent of Americans now owns half the nation’s wealth. In 2005, the total wealth of all U.S. millionaires was $30 trillion, more than the annual wealth produced in China, Japan, Brazil, Russia and the European Union combined!

The extent of inequality has angered the working class and alarmed sections of the establishment. Inequality in “the land of opportunity” is usually blamed on the victim for lacking the skills and determination to succeed. Now that the majority has been left behind, this excuse has lost credibility. Consider this editorial comment from the New York Times (August 29, 2007),

“The median household income last year was still about $1,000 less than in 2000, before the onset of the last recession… [W]hen household incomes rose, it was because more members of the household went to work, not because anybody got a bigger paycheck…The earnings of men and women working full time actually fell more than 1 percent last year…[T]he spoils of the nation’s economic growth have flowed almost exclusively to the wealthy and the extremely wealthy, leaving little for everybody else.”

Americans are seething with discontent over falling living standards, the environmental crisis, the war and the abysmal state of the medical system. In the spring of 2006, this anger exploded in the largest demonstrations in the nation’s history. Protesting anti-immigrant policies and chanting “We are America,” the working class rose up and punched the capitalist class in the face. That fall, the Republican majority was swept from office by voters who were sick of government lies, incompetence and corruption.

Reform or revolution

The powers-that-be are concerned that popular discontent could coalesce into a generalized rebellion against the system. This happened after World War I, during the 1930s, and in the 1960s.

There are only two solutions to such crises: reform from above to restore confidence in the system or revolution from below to replace it. Let’s examine the first option.

Both the Democratic and Republican Parties are committed to victory in Iraq. To counter widespread anti-war sentiment, Washington has repackaged the war as military support for the Iraqi government, with Iraqi incompetence being blamed for “delaying” troop withdrawal. Regular announcements of “signs of progress” imply that the war is winding down when it is actually escalating. This stalling tactic seems to be working, for now.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Contact Editor

RaGiNg AgAiNsT the CoNgReSsIoNaL WaR MaChInE


by Kevin Gosztola Page 1 of 1 page(s)

http://www.opednews.com



Tell A Friend

I am sure that the articles will come pouring into OpEdNews.com by all the talented and wonderful political writers who submit every day here. I have nothing to compete with those well-reasoned articles that will come forward. Nor do I have the time to explain, justify, or rationalize what has happened. There really isn’t anything to explain, justify, or rationalize. All I am feeling right now is rage.

The situation is this: The Democrats proclaim themselves to be anti-war yet continue to pass legislation that allows war to continue. That’s all there is to it. And the picture posted on DailyKos right now parodying the General Petraeus MoveOn ad says it all. Congress has betrayed us.

What’s even more stunning, and this comes from a red state, is that in my home state of Indiana one of the two Republican Senators to vote “nay” came from this red pro-Iraq War “Support the Troops” state. The senator I refer to is a very respectable leader and a member of the Republican Party that I am glad to see leading this country. He understands foreign policy better than the majority of our elected officials and has proven that fact today. His name is Richard Lugar.

You would have thought that the other Senate Democrat Evan Bayh would have voted “nay” too because the Democrats are anti-war and would like to not see “military instruments” used in Iran. You would be wrong.

And so, I have a dilemma here. The Democrat I expected to trust is for operations in Iran. The Republican who I respect but not necessarily support is breaking with his party and voting against operations. He understands like Hagel does that we are in a war in Afghanistan and Iraq and cannot start a third war. That is ludicrous! Plus, Iran is so much bigger than Iraq and has more people and the terrain is so different. We are asking for a bloody defeat here and Lugar recognizes that we need to be cautious and not take action at this point. Because my Democratic Senator failed to recognize what Lugar did, I will be calling him and informing him that he made a mistake.

Evan Bayh has been a spineless, hapless, gutless Democrat today. Twenty-nine Senate Democrats were spineless, hapless, gutless leaders today.

As Webb characterized the amendment, “Cheney’s fondest pipe dream” may have just been realized. That doesn’t matter though. We aren’t trying to impeach him. We are holding him and others in this administration accountable in other ways.

You know what? Let's call Lugar and Hagel and thank them for breaking with their party. Thank them for being leaders and having the courage to stand up for us. Let's not take their vote for granted. If we are going to chide them when they do us wrong, let's call in and say thank you for sticking up for us when Democratic leaders failed.

(Side note, in the House, it was like deja vu all over again with House Democrats drinking the Republican condemn MoveOn.org kool-aid. Guess what my Democratic Congressman did? He voted for it.)

myorwelliannightmare.newsvine.com

Kevin Gosztola is from Mishawaka, Indiana. He is studying film at Columbia College in Chicago and loves movies but has an even greater love for this country. He has been reading political books and following politics since he was 15 years old feeling that it is necessary to pay attention to his country, a feeling that was instilled in him by his 5th grade teacher when she asked us all to watch the news every morning. He likes music especially music with politically charged lyrics or progressive undertones. He hopes to become a filmmaker who makes regular movies along with avant-garde ones and documentaries. In everything he does, he wants to fight for the greater good and also push the limits of what is accepte in society. He believes in life with no boundaries and loves the underdog. That's why he supports guys like Kucinich for 2008 even when people around him point at him and laugh calling him crazy. He's not afraid to lose if he knows what he's doing is right.

Contact Author

Contact Editor

View Other Articles by Author

Finding Beauty in the Silence. With thanks to James Dean and Arthur on this anniversary.


by Melinda Pillsbury-Foster Page 1 of 2 page(s)

http://www.opednews.com



Tell A Friend

Rob was surprised to hear that James Dean was not the angst-ridden youth he portrayed on the screen. Rob teaches meditation and that was the subject that brought up Jimmy. I was around five when Jimmy taught me to seek my inward Silence, letting all fear, sadness, uncertainty drain out as I reached into the silence behind the wind.

That is what my Dad had called it when he told me about finding it himself when he was eight. The auto accident in 1911 that killed his mother and father left him afraid of heights; he had been thrown from the car as it careened into a canyon.

Jimmy had listened to the story as we sat on the lawn one afternoon; My father had told me about hearing the Silence as he learned to climb the cliffs of Yosemite. Dad had learned from his father, who had been afraid of heights until he had been lost at 10,000 feet dangling on the torn girding of a balloon over San Francisco in 1909. Looking down, Arthur C., his uncle and adopted father, lost his fear, whipped away in the wind and wonder. That had helped Dad when he started climbing in Yosemite. I have picture of Dad when he was around nine, sitting with his feet dangling into nothingness on Overhanging Rock.

Jimmy understood.

Jimmy was the person who told me that the same Silence connected me to God.

Much later I realized that the Friends he talked about that day were Quakers. He had learned about the Silence in Meeting. Sometimes it takes a while for things to connect when you don't understand the terms. I was raised Congregationalist.

My conversations with Jimmy ranged over many subjects in the years I knew him. I remember each of those conversations. I remember the excitement of rolling the ideas around in my mind, tasting them, examining them from different angles. I stored them up, taking them out to examine frequently. Each brought with it trains of other new ideas, each leading inevitably and logically to others.

Over the years I learned that ideas lead you in new directions, to discover unexpected beauty in things you thought were completely ordinary.

Rob, who is also a Buddhist priest, was surprised to hear how Jimmy described the process of photosynthesis. “Trees breathe; They breathe in light – and breathe out life.” Jimmy had told me that on an earlier occasion. I had in that moment seen the connections between the breath I took and the tree that made some part of the air I breathed. Oh. The tree's life flowed into me.....amazing, connections knitting life in all directions.

Jimmy surprised everyone who really understood him, though as time passes I understand how few must have seen this side of him.

This September 30th Jimmy will have been dead 52 years. He was 24 the day his Porsche Spyder swerved to avoid a clunker on the road ahead in Central California so, if he had lived, he would now be a cantankerous 76. I know, if he had lived, he would still be excited about ideas and the world would be a different place. He had firm intentions in that direction.

Life brings many changes, not all of them ones that fill us with joy.

Tomorrow is the 27th, the tenth anniversary of another event that brought enlightenment and changed my life. That is the day when my oldest son, then 19, nearly died for the first time.

Arthur went 300 feet 20 feet in the air, thrown off his motorcycle. He landed on his face. No one at the hospital thought he would live; it was a near thing. Six months later he shot himself through the brain. He lived, the doctors did not expect that, either.

Looking back you always wonder what you could have done to change one moment in time, to give events a different course. Imperfect knowledge breeds imperfect outcomes and leads one to wonder about the nature of 'perfection.' All of life is temporary, imperfect; but what we learn is forever. Arthur is glad he is alive; so am I. Sometimes finding yourself takes you into unexpected places that bring amazing blessings.

When Arthur was small he learned to ride a skateboard; watching him was terrifying at first, but there was beauty and grace there as he glided over the pavement. I know he did not see that himself. He was looking for a different kind of perfection. I could see that as elation on his face when he came home.

After he shot himself he had to learn everything over again and it took years before he could walk unassisted. Those steps were slow and unsteady. But in each step there was strength and courage that deepened my respect. Others may see the handicap. I see the man who has found that same Silence internal that my father and Jimmy once helped me find. But I also remember my son, gliding down the street as if he flowed on air.

1 | 2

http://howtheneoconsstolefreedom.blogspot.com

Melinda Pillsbury-Foster is the author of GREED: The NeoConning of America and A Tour of Old Yosemite. The former is a novel about the lives of the NeoCons with a strong autobiographical component. The latter is a non-fiction book about her father and grandfather.

Ms. Pillsbury-Foster has been active in politics since the Goldwater Campaign. She left the Republican Party to join and become active in the Libertarian Party in 1973, working as an activist and party officer until she left the Libertarian Party in 1988 when she returned to the Republican Party and became active in the National Federation of Republican Women.

She is also the the founder of the the Arthur C. Pillsbury Foundation

Contact Author

Contact Editor

View Other Articles by Author

Movie Review: The Kingdom

by Joel S. Hirschhorn Page 1 of 1 page(s)

http://www.opednews.com


Tell A Friend

At your first opportunity go see The Kingdom.


Every once in awhile I see a film that seems perfect in every cinematic respect. The Kingdom is such a film. It has accomplished the nearly impossible. It is superbly entertaining as an action and suspense film. And it works as a movie with multiple contemporary messages about the conflict between the Western and Arab worlds and the war on terrorism.
The Kingdom has a terrific cast, even in relatively minor roles. At the top are Jamie Foxx, Chris Cooper and Jennifer Garner as three members of a four-person FBI team sent to Saudi Arabia to investigate a major terrorist attack on a community housing American workers that has killed many of them. All the film’s actors are at the top of their game, which shows the talent of the director, Peter Berg. Ashraf Barhom, who plays the Saudi police colonel – first an antagonist and finally a friend to the Foxx character – does a remarkable job.

The visual aspects of the film are beyond incredible. You definitely believe that you are seeing the real Saudi Arabia. That’s because much of the film was shot in Abu Dhabi of the United Arab Emirates. When it comes to the action aspects of the film, if you watch it in a good theater with a large screen and a great sound system, as I did, you will almost be blown out of your seat and find yourself cringing with white knuckles. Car chase and crash scenes are the best I have seen – period. If you have never been in a terrible automobile accident, this film will give you the experience.


When it comes to the extensive scenes involving a whole lot of shooting between the good guys – the FBI team members and some Saudi police – versus the Saudi insurgent terrorists, here too you will experience the blood and gore and incredible tension and loud noise of a real gun battle in close quarters. Some may think these scenes are excessive. I did not. They are brilliantly designed and directed to communicate the visceral feel of moment-to-moment gun battles where those involved fear the worst in the next micro-second for good reason. The suspense is ramped up and stays in the red zone for what seems eternity. Will the captured FBI agent be rescued before the incredibly brutal terrorists chop his head off? Trust me: you will be guessing until the final moment arrives. When Garner finally kills one of the top terrorists in one of the best fight scenes every filmed the audience burst out into wild applause, and for good reason – it felt like we all were fighting the bad guy.


What transforms this film from an excellent action/suspense flick to a truly memorable film is that it succeeds in delivering a number of messages without being preachy or overly intellectual. The deepest dimensions of the current conflict between the terrorist Muslim world and western civilization are wonderfully delivered through brilliant, smart dialogue that reinforces the film’s visual violence. That Americans can find friendship with citizens of a country like Saudi Arabia is also shown with remarkable controlled emotion that brings many viewers to tears. And the conflict between the Saudi government that is totally anti-democratic and the nation’s terrorist and fundamentalist insurgents is also creatively portrayed. The burden of being a woman in an Arab country is also shown through the various insults that Garner’s character experiences.


For the record, while the FBI is made to look effective and even heroic, the State Department is made to look worse than incompetent.


Lastly, this is a film with a remarkably good screenplay, written by Matthew Michael Carnahan. After the initial stunning scenes of the terrorist bombing, as the main character played by Foxx fights a bureaucratic battle in Washington, D.C. to get permission to go to Saudi Arabia to investigate the terrible terrorist event that has also killed an FBI agent and close friend,, the dialogue among the FBI agents and between Foxx and high level federal officials is just perfect. The arrogance and stupidity that we expect of high level federal officials is quickly shown through wonderful dialogue. And every now and then there are some really funny lines throughout the film, making the moments of violence and suspense even more effective.


I can’t wait to see this film again.



www.delusionaldemocracy.com

Joel S. Hirschhorn is the author of Delusional Democracy - Fixing the Republic Without Overthrowing the Government (www.delusionaldemocracy.com). His current political writings have been greatly influenced by working as a senior staffer for the U.S. Congress and for the National Governors Association. He advocates a Second American Revolution, beginning with an Article V Convention to propose constitutional amendments.

Contact Author

Contact Editor

View Other Articles by Author

HuffPost Exclusive: a Scene from John Cusack's War Inc.

Arianna Huffington

Arianna Huffington


HuffPost Exclusive: a Scene from John Cusack's War Inc.

Posted September 26, 2007 | 03:29 PM (EST)



War Inc." border="0"> War Inc."> War Inc." border="0"> War Inc." border="0"> War Inc." border="0">

HuffPost blogger Paul Krassner, founder of the radical rag The Realist, has praised good satire as "a way of calling attention to the contradictions or the hypocrisy that's going on officially. That's the function of humor -- it can alter your reality."

And our current reality can certainly use some altering. Enter John Cusack, who has made a powerful new film, War Inc. that pulls off the near-impossible: finding a savage reality-altering humor amidst the tragedy of Iraq. It delivers a wicked punch in the gut, making you laugh, wince, and get outraged all at the same time.

Naomi Klein, whose writings on Iraq helped inspire Cusack, feels the same way. "War Inc. is one of those rare satires with the danger left in," she told me. "It cranks up the dial on the state of privatized war just enough that we can finally see our present clearly. As you're watching it, you can't help wondering: can these guys really get away with this? Are we all going to get in trouble? It's an extremely good feeling. It's what risk feels like."

Cusack has given HuffPost an exclusive clip from the movie at its most uncorked. I asked John why he chose the black comedy route to address such a tragic subject. "This was the only way to stay one step ahead of reality," he told me, "one step ahead of the absurdities wrought by the neo-conservative, neo-liberal experiment in the Middle East and around the world. A lot of people have been feeling what Naomi has brilliantly chronicled and what I'm trying to capture in this movie: the ever expanding war machine is completely out of control and has morphed into something far more dangerous than Eisenhower ever imagined. It is absolutely immoral to profit from making 'defense' policy."

So check out the War Inc. clip below. And if you haven't watched the video of John's HuffPost interview with Naomi about her new book, click here.

The Jena Six and US History


By Paul Ortiz
t r u t h o u t | Perspective

Thursday 27 September 2007

I was in the middle of an extended research trip in the South when news of the march and rally to free the Jena Six began flowing through the blogosphere. What has transpired in Jena in support of six young black men is an important new chapter in the black freedom struggle.

The Jena Six are six black teens from Jena, Louisiana, who were accused of fighting and beating up a fellow high school student last December. The student who was beaten up was white. While the victim in question suffered no severe injuries, the six black youths were initially charged by the local district attorney with attempted murder and conspiracy to commit murder. The murder weapons, according to the DA, were the perpetrators' tennis shoes. This is how much progress we've made in the United States: what used to be seen as a schoolyard brawl punishable by suspension or community service has become a crime punishable by life in prison. After a wave of publicity, the charges were reduced in most of the cases to battery and conspiracy which may still result in over two decades of prison time for these kids. One of the defendants remains in jail after being unable to post $90,000 bail.

According to the local authorities in Jena, we are supposed to believe that race has nothing to do with the charges levied against the high school students.

Earlier incidents of violence and intimidation directed against black students at Jena were ignored by local law enforcement officials. In one incident, a white man pulled a shotgun on a black teen, and on another occasion white youths smashed a black youth over the head with a beer bottle. Black residents also reported that whites were spewing racist epithets at them in public. All of these incidents were reported to authorities, and the police did absolutely nothing in the months leading up to the beating.

Local authorities also claim that three nooses hung on a tree at the high school three months before the fight had nothing to do with race. African-Americans in Jena report that the nooses were hung up after black students sat under a tree that some white students felt was reserved for them. While this version of the story has been disputed by school officials, according to the district attorney, it doesn't matter anyway. The DA claims that young people are so ignorant about their histories that they wouldn't know what the nooses were supposed to represent! The US attorney for western Louisiana concluded that there couldn't be any possible linkage between the nooses and the subsequent school fight. It was reported that one of the witnesses for the youth who was beaten was also one of the students connected to the noose hanging.

In Jena, as throughout the rest of the US, we are supposed to believe that "race is no longer an issue" and that justice is colorblind. California fits the pattern perfectly. Out here, Martin Luther King Jr. commemorations have become exercises in remembering how bad racism used to be [in the South] but thank God almighty we are free at last! I am really, really glad that tens of thousands of demonstrators who descended on Jena on behalf of the six young black men ignored what has embarrassingly become the "common sense" position on race relations in this nation.

Many progressives today would like to de-emphasize or even separate the struggle against racism from efforts to end war and bring economic justice to the Americas. Their rationale is that white folks get upset when you talk too much about racial inequality and that the only way to draw the white working class to the movement is to keep quiet about race. This viewpoint is insulting to white people and it ignores the history of social change in this country. The nonracial proletarian revolution has never occurred in this country, and it never will. White people could not make the revolution by themselves in 1776, and they certainly cannot do it now. Furthermore, you cannot erase five hundred years of slavery, segregation, the Mexican-American War, the Sand Creek Massacre, Bracero programs, etc., etc. Tell the parents of the Jena Six or the survivors of Hurricane Katrina that we are all equally oppressed by capitalism. Race and class are forever linked in this nation.

Furthermore, one should be ashamed to discuss globalization in the western hemisphere without examining the transatlantic slave trade, racial colonialism and continuing racial disparities in countries like Brazil, Honduras and the United States. To ignore the centrality of race in the western hemisphere is to replicate the thoughts of a local educator in Jena who sincerely believes what she told Amy Goodman about the nooses hung at her school: "The nooses? I don't even know why they were there, what they were supposed to mean."

According to a black teacher in Jena, the DA told an assembly of students, "I could end your lives with the stroke of a pen." He's right. Thanks to the so-called War on Drugs, our prisons are overwhelmingly composed of African-Americans and Latinos. Never mind that neither African-Americans nor Latinos engage in more drug activity than their white peers; the latter just don't get busted nearly as often. In the town of Santa Cruz, California, where I live, it is an open secret that white kids routinely get away with public drug usage while Latino kids in particular are routinely harassed by law enforcement authorities for wearing bandanas and blue shirts. Oh, I forgot: since Santa Cruz is progressive, we don't do racial profiling; we are beyond race. Just like Jena. Hmm, perhaps there is a pattern here.

To understand what is happening in Jena, it is necessary to know something about black history as well as the history of race relations in the US. African-Americans have always been at the forefront of the struggle to expand democracy in the Americas. They have rarely been able to count on sustained outside support in their efforts to end slavery, segregation and other forms of oppression. Yes, there have been heroic, anti-racist white folks like José Martí, John Brown, Anne Braden, Eduardo Galeano and the white SNCC and CORE volunteers of the 1960s civil rights movement. Unfortunately, however, these organizations and individuals like them represent exceptions in the history of this hemisphere. The usual story involves African-descent peoples fighting their battles alone - to paraphrase Walter Mosley, "always outnumbered, always outgunned." Jena may signal a modern turning point in this crisis. If non-black people began to understand that they have a stake in fighting racial oppression in their own backyards, then we've just exponentially increased the size of the movement.

Here are a few of the stories on the black freedom struggle that I have been researching this summer:

  • In 1895, a white mob gathered in Guilford County, North Carolina, to lynch a black man by the name of Arthur Tuttle, who was being held at the county courthouse. As the men approached the courthouse, however, they discovered that scores of black citizens were waiting for them at the building's steps. As one of Tuttle's African-American defenders informed Richmond Planet editor John Mitchell Jr.: "But being on to violators of law and order, we had our Winchesters and revolvers in readiness and took our station near the jail house awaiting, but the lynchers did not come Monday night."
  • In 1918, the white school superintendent of Wilson, North Carolina, slapped a black teacher by the name of Mary Euell for questioning his authority. When queried by the media, the superintendent replied: "I slapped Mary Euell for gross discourtesy to me in my office. I am sure that there is no white man in Wilson who would have acted otherwise under the circumstance.... I slapped her face and made her hush up."

    When Ms. Euell told her colleagues at Wilson Colored Graded School what had transpired, the black female teachers resigned en masse and drafted a protest statement calling their community to action. African-Americans pulled their children out of Wilson Graded and created the Independent School. Future Broadway star Georgia Burke organized a whirlwind of dramatic theater fundraisers starring primary-aged schoolchildren that dazzled audiences throughout eastern North Carolina. The Independent School educated hundreds of children during its nine-year existence. Otha R. Davis, a graduate of the school - and one of Ms. Burke's young thespians - credited the school with much of his success in life. He had fond memories of the teachers and the curriculum. Mr. Davis was 95 years old when I interviewed him this summer.

  • In 1919, African-Americans in Florida organized a statewide civil rights movement in the most brutal state of the South, a place that had the highest lynching rate during segregation. Florida's governor frequently bragged about "killing a nigger" to his audiences. Black workers initiated the movement by going out on strike and demanding economic justice. Tens of thousands of African-Americans paid their poll taxes, registered to vote and tried to vote on Election Day, 1920. Many were gunned down, beaten or forced to flee the state. The progressive left, including the Socialists, the Anarchists, the white students and the labor movement, did nothing to help black Floridians that year.

In researching these events and in thinking of the struggle to free the Jena Six, I have often wondered: what if a small handful of whites had joined hands with their black counterparts in Guilford to stop the lynching of Arthur Tuttle? What if two or three white teachers in Wilson had joined in solidarity with their black sisters? What if someone in the progressive left had stood up after the election of 1920 to demand an investigation in Florida? Perhaps history would not have turned out differently, but on the other hand, what if Margaret Mead was right when she said: "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

One of the lessons that we can learn from the Jena Six case is the perseverance of black people in the struggle for equal justice in this country. One of the failures of the contemporary left is its inability to learn more from African-American political movements. This too often leads to a kind of progressive condescension towards black southerners, especially, that is embarrassing and anti-democratic.

It is inspiring to see how many books and articles have been written about Seattle 1999, Chiapas or global justice insurgencies. However, the best case study that we have for broad-based social change is still by far the black-led civil rights movement, and we need to learn more from it. Works like Charles Payne's "I've Got the Light of Freedom: The Organizing Tradition and the Mississippi Freedom Struggle" and Barbara Ransby's "Ella Baker and the Black Freedom Movement: A Radical Democratic Vision" show how ordinary people with little or no resources take on vastly richer, heavily armed tyrants and sometimes win.

After the publicity in Jena wanes, what is left? Guardian columnist Gary Younge urges us to not lose momentum after last week's rallies and marches. Younge advises that we must continue to give the Jena Six our attention and support.

But Younge goes further to state: "And last but by no means least the activists must leverage the attention that has been given to the Jena Six to raise the broader issues of social justice and racism in the penal and judicial systems in the US."

This means that activists who missed the marches last week (such as myself) have some concrete things to do back home. Let's make a point about talking and working for racial justice in our own communities. If you are white, talk to your white friends about racism. Do not allow casual remarks about the "minorities running everything" or racial epithets go unchallenged. And, let's not make the mistake of assuming that Jena, Louisiana, is some kind of backwards, isolated place. Jena, Louisiana, is America, and it is no more or less racist these days than any other part of the United States. Even as marchers assembled in Jena, police in Oakland, California, shot a black man, Gary King Jr., in the back and killed him. Eyewitnesses allege that King was unarmed and running in fear from the police.

Finally, I'd like to see more Latino/Latinas and Latino organizations getting involved in the struggle to free the Jena Six. We have been subjected to many of the same prejudices - albeit less intensively in many cases - as African-Americans have. It makes no sense to complain about the lack of black presence at our immigration or union rallies if we sit out Jena as well as other critical struggles involving our African-American brothers and sisters.

--------

Paul Ortiz teaches in the Department of Community Studies at UC-Santa Cruz. He is co-editor of the book "Behind the Veil: Documenting African American Life in the Jim Crow South" and writer of the book "Emancipation Betrayed."

-------

Judge Rules Provisions in Patriot Act to Be Illegal


By Susan Jo Keller
The New York Times

Thursday 27 September 2007

Washington - A federal judge in Oregon ruled Wednesday that crucial parts of the USA Patriot Act were not constitutional because they allowed federal surveillance and searches of Americans without demonstrating probable cause.

The ruling by Judge Anne L. Aiken of Federal District Court in Portland was in the case of Brandon Mayfield, a lawyer in Portland who was arrested and jailed after the Federal Bureau of Investigation mistakenly linked him to the Madrid train bombings in March 2004.

"For over 200 years, this nation has adhered to the rule of law - with unparalleled success," Judge Aiken's opinion said in finding violations of the Fourth Amendment prohibitions against unreasonable search and seizure. "A shift to a nation based on extraconstitutional authority is prohibited, as well as ill advised."

The ruling is a new chapter in a legal battle that began after the Spanish police found a plastic bag with detonator caps in a van near the bombings, which killed 191 people and left 2,000 injured in the deadliest terrorist attack in Europe since World War II.

Initially, the F.B.I. found no match for the fingerprints. But after reviewing a digitally enhanced set of the prints, the agency identified 20 possible matches, including Mr. Mayfield.

Though Spanish officials had doubts about the match, federal agents began surveillance on him and his family, using expanded powers under the Patriot Act. Mr. Mayfield was jailed for two weeks before a federal judge threw out the case.

Mr. Mayfield, 38, who was born in Oregon and brought up in a small town in Kansas, converted to Islam in 1989. He was a lawyer in a child custody case for Jeffrey Leon Battle, who had been convicted of conspiring to aid the Taliban and Al Qaeda.

Mr. Mayfield said his religion and legal work had led investigators to be overzealous in connecting him to the Madrid plot.

Mr. Mayfield sued the government, which apologized and agreed to a $2 million settlement last November. The settlement included an unusual condition that freed the government from future liability with one exception. Mr. Mayfield was allowed to continue a suit seeking to overturn parts of the Patriot Act.

It was that suit on which Judge Aiken ruled Wednesday. Her opinion said the court recognized that "a difficult balance must be struck in a manner that preserves the peace and security of our nation while at the same time preserving the constitutional rights and civil liberties of all Americans."

In examining the history of the Federal Intelligence Surveillance Act, the opinion discussed a change by Congress in October 2001, under the Patriot Act, that allows surveillance and searches if the government declares that "a significant purpose" of that activity is gathering foreign intelligence. In the past, such searches and surveillance had been allowed if "the purpose" was to obtain foreign intelligence.

Congress's intent, the opinion said, was "to break down barriers between criminal law enforcement and intelligence gathering." Judge Aiken said a practical effect of "a seemingly minor change in wording" was to allow the government to avoid the constitutional probable cause requirement.

"In place of the Fourth Amendment," the judge wrote, "the people are expected to defer to the Executive Branch and its representation that it will authorize such surveillance only when appropriate."

She said the government was "asking this court to, in essence, amend the Bill of Rights, by giving it an interpretation that would deprive it of any real meaning."

A spokesman for the Justice Department, Peter Carr, said it was reviewing the decision and declined to comment further.

A lawyer for Mr. Mayfield, Elden Rosenthal, issued a statement on his behalf saying that Judge Aiken "has upheld both the tradition of judicial independence and our nation's most cherished principle of the right to be secure in one's own home."

-------

DAILY GRIST

TOP STORY

Brad Pitt. Photo: Amy Graves / WireImage Home Sexy Home
Brad Pitt pledges $5 million for green homes in New Orleans

At the third annual Clinton Global Initiative philanthropic soiree yesterday, actor Brad Pitt pledged $5 million in matching funds to build about 150 green homes in New Orleans' Lower Ninth Ward neighborhood, one of the most troubled areas in the city. "We're going to help make it right with 150 sustainable, affordable houses -- houses that stand out for their design both aesthetically and structurally, so that these people can live in beautiful safe structures that respect their spirit and provide a good quality of life," said Pitt. Real-estate bigwig Steve Bing also pledged $5 million in matching funds for the effort. Other green announcements at the CGI included power company Florida Power & Light unveiling its plans for a 300-megawatt solar thermal plant, as one part of a $2.4 billion initiative. That broad initiative would also see an additional solar thermal plant in California, and would provide millions in funding to help power users reduce their consumption. Still other funding pledged at the high-profile conference included money for education and health initiatives for especially needy areas around the world.



TODAY'S NEWS

You Really Can't Have Too Many Meetings
Bush hosts climate meeting of world's largest emitters

Representatives from the world's 17 largest greenhouse-gas emitters are gathering today in the good ol' U.S. of A. for a climate-change discussion. (And yes, the United Nations did just have one of those -- President Bush played hooky.) The group, which includes China, India, and Brazil, was convened today by Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, and Bush will address them tomorrow. Some E.U. nations are represented by junior ministers, as their senior officials have just, ahem, attended the U.N. meeting. Some see the summit as evidence that Bush is finally, finally, taking leadership on the climate issue; others fear that the group will latch onto fast-track voluntary measures, undermining the long-term, stricter standards likely to come out of U.N. negotiations. Either way, don't expect immediate significant action: White House officials say the main goal is to set a plan for deciding how, and how much, to cut emissions, and expect that four or five more meetings will follow over the next year.


Permanent Pressure
Banks and international leaders turn up pressure on Bush to act against climate change

President Bush may be playing host to his very own climate summit, but that hasn't mollified folks around the world who want to see real action to stave off climate change. In fact, the pressure to act is stronger than ever. This week, some of the world's leading banks are gathering as lobbying group International Carbon Investors and Services to urge the U.S. and other developed nations to introduce a lightly regulated carbon-trading program. And government officials from around the globe went to the White House earlier this week to urge mandatory cuts in greenhouse-gas emissions. Not to mention the near-constant ragging the administration gets from a certain scrappy, incisive web magazine. Personally, we don't know how they stand it.


Total Recall
Over 500,000 more toys recalled due to lead

Another round of recalls was issued yesterday for over 500,000 children's toys or accessories that were found to exceed allowable lead levels, including more Thomas the Tank Engine paraphernalia and the now conspicuously gloomy Happy Giddy Gardening Tools from Target. Federal regulators were quick to point out that this recall won't be the last. "After the first set of recalls, retailers and manufacturers reported they would take a very systematic inventory to determine whether any of their products were in violation of the lead paint standard," said Julie Vallese, a spokesperson for the Consumer Product Safety Commission. "These recalls are a result of that inventory ... there is the anticipation that there will be more lead recalls in the future." The CPSC is making a recall list and checking it ... well, at least once. Our suggestion for recall-jaded parents: start a neighborhood pool about what'll be in the next round of recalls. Keeps it interesting and it might just pay off! We're giving 2 to 1 odds on toy cars -- any takers?


Charmer in the Dell
Dell Inc. pledges to go carbon neutral

PC manufacturer Dell Inc. has announced plans to go entirely carbon neutral by next year. (Take that, Nokia!) The company will focus on energy efficiency and renewable power, and offset additional emissions. In addition, Dell's "Plant a Tree for Me" program, wherein customers can direct funds to global tree planting, will expand to "Plant a Forest for Me," a partnership with other organizations to facilitate sustainable reforestation. No doubt Dell, which recently lost its No. 1 spot in the PC market, hopes new green measures will help it turn over a new leaf.



Work It, Working Assets Customers
Grist made the list -- now we need your votes

Direct donations to Grist the cheap 'n' lazy way: Customers of socially conscious phone-service and credit-card provider Working Assets can go to the company's voting page and assign maximum points to Grist (we're in the Education & Freedom of Expression section) -- with that one button click from you, a little bit o' dough comes our way at the end of the year. The number of votes we get determines the chunk of change we get, so we do need your support. To help us track our progress, please send a note to tstout@grist.org after you've voted. And thank you!

GRIST COLUMNS AND FEATURES

Cookin' It Old School
Time to reinvest in the school-lunch program

You might not have enjoyed school lunches when you were growing up -- but at least you got fed. In a growing number of schools around the country, budget crises are leading to higher prices, shorter lunchtimes, and even kids denied meals if they fall behind on their lunch money. Is that any way to treat the shining promise of society? Tom Philpott explains how we got to this point and what you can do about it -- as soon as mid-October.


One Way. Photo: iStockphoto Pressure Points
Parenting series looks at the ease of succumbing

As our parenting series nears its Friday close, we bring you two reflections on being green and healthy in the face of pressure. Amy Linn admits that her daughter's eyes light up at the sight of a bowl of nuclear-orange SpongeBob mac 'n' cheese, and she offers tips from a nutritionist on how to gently encourage older kids to eat better -- as well as a downloadable cheat sheet on what's really wrong with today's junk food. Meanwhile, Grist blogger Christine Gardner chronicles her family's train trip to Chicago, their sweaty stumble through a downtown park, and the best way she knows to answer questions about her green choices: lie.

Grist: Environmental News and Commentary
a beacon in the smog (tm)
©2007. Grist Magazine, Inc. All rights reserved. Gloom and doom with a sense of humor®.